Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add rule for postnl.nl #612

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 30, 2025
Merged

Add rule for postnl.nl #612

merged 1 commit into from
Jan 30, 2025

Conversation

muodov
Copy link
Member

@muodov muodov commented Jan 29, 2025

@muodov muodov requested a review from noisysocks January 29, 2025 12:53
@muodov muodov added the minor Increment the minor version when merged label Jan 29, 2025
Copy link
Contributor

@noisysocks noisysocks left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

:shipit: 🌈

"vendorUrl": "https://postnl.nl",
"cosmetic": false,
"runContext": {
"urlPattern": "^https://([^.]+\\.)?postnl\\.nl/"
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Just for my own education, do we do this for site-specific rules where the selectors are pretty generic?

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

yeah, exactly. When you're 100% sure this will only work on a specific site, there's no point checking the rule on other domains

@@ -0,0 +1,34 @@
{
"name": "postnl",
"vendorUrl": "https://postnl.nl",
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Is vendorUrl needed for a site specific rule?

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

vendorUrl is there just for information, so it's up to the author I suppose

@muodov muodov merged commit 46b8497 into main Jan 30, 2025
10 checks passed
@muodov muodov deleted the postnl branch January 30, 2025 16:13
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
minor Increment the minor version when merged
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants