-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 314
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
fix: optional fields wpa enterprise #5043
fix: optional fields wpa enterprise #5043
Conversation
337ce11
to
d33f5b4
Compare
Hi @MMaiero, when I do the same on my end I get the following I believe in your screenshots, the dialogue you are seeing is caused by the IPv4 page. it appears the IPv4 checking occurs first, and it takes precedent before the 802.1x tab. Will see if there is a way to make this more straightforward for the end user. |
d33f5b4
to
5ee6de4
Compare
Hi, thanks for the update. I still see this from a clean installation of the OS (bookworm 32 bits) and Kura Screen.Recording.2023-12-20.at.10.05.06.mov |
Signed-off-by: MMaiero <[email protected]>
d5c8ea6
to
c078804
Compare
Signed-off-by: MMaiero <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: MMaiero <[email protected]>
Tested on RPi OS... connecting fine to the WPA Enterprise Access Point. Issue 1There's still an issue with the CA-Cert: it's tagged as "Optional" but the backend will refuse to work if there's no cert set throwing the following error.
... but it's outside the scope of this PR. Issue 2Identity can be set as blank and it gets highlight with error... but you can still submit the form. After submitting it gets restored to the previous value. I don't know if it's worth fixing it. Issue 3When switching EAP type the populated field stay blue... Weird glitch... but again: not a deal breaker. Issue 4Inner Authentication is a drop down but is always disabled. Is this expected? |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
IMO it could be OK as is (the only doubt I have is on Issue 2)...
Our UI is a weird beast...
Signed-off-by: MMaiero <[email protected]>
Issue 2 should be fixed now. I broke the check during the refactoring. |
Did you push some additional changes? I can't see them and the CI wasn't triggered. |
Sorry, I pushed on origin instead of doing that in Greg's fork |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Issue 2 resolution confirmed. LGTM
This PR aims to fix the optional bug, where when clearing and applying a field, the original value persists.
Brief description of the PR. [e.g. Added
null
check onobject
to avoidNullPointerException
]Related Issue: This PR fixes/closes {issue number}
Description of the solution adopted: A more detailed description of the changes made to solve/close one or more issues. If the PR is simple and easy to understand this section can be skipped
Screenshots: If applicable, add screenshots to help explain your solution
now able to clear fields after applying
Manual Tests: Optional description of the tests performed to check correct functioning of changes, useful for an efficient review
Any side note on the changes made: Description of any other change that has been made, which is not directly linked to the issue resolution [e.g. Code clean up/Sonar issue resolution]