Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat: update multisig-prover with latest rkyv crate API updates #33

Merged
merged 36 commits into from
Aug 12, 2024

Conversation

eloylp
Copy link
Member

@eloylp eloylp commented Jul 29, 2024

Referenced issue
Part of https://github.com/eigerco/solana-axelar-internal/issues/372

Description

It just updates few public API breaking changes we did at https://github.com/eigerco/solana-axelar-internal/pull/369. Basically, now signatures are requiring to specify the hasher implementation. More info in the linked pull-request and linked issue.

Reviewer recommendations

Since this changes were already approved and merged in the rkyv crate, i think the validity of the code could be checked by just doing a cargo test in the root of the repository.

The only commit that needs to be reviewed is 6e80906

cgorenflo and others added 30 commits July 16, 2024 13:18
@eloylp eloylp changed the base branch from main to solana July 29, 2024 16:26
@eloylp eloylp requested a review from Chxpz July 29, 2024 16:33
@eloylp eloylp marked this pull request as ready for review July 29, 2024 16:33
@eloylp eloylp self-assigned this Jul 29, 2024
@eloylp
Copy link
Member Author

eloylp commented Jul 30, 2024

This branch carries latest upstream changes from main 1a1f072 , this should be a merge commit, not squash.

Copy link
Member

@roberts-pumpurs roberts-pumpurs left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

lgtm, although I only reviewed 6e80906

@eloylp eloylp merged commit 08c4878 into solana Aug 12, 2024
1 of 6 checks passed
@eloylp eloylp deleted the update-rkyv-multisig branch August 12, 2024 08:29
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

9 participants