Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

apm: change default sampling.tail.storage_limit #4814

Closed
wants to merge 3 commits into from

Conversation

carsonip
Copy link
Member

@carsonip carsonip commented Feb 3, 2025

Description

Update default value of apm-server sampling.tail.storage_limit to 0 as part of elastic/apm-server#14933
This is the new default from 9.0.

Documentation sets edited in this PR

Check all that apply.

  • Stateful (docs/en/observability/*)
  • Serverless (docs/en/serverless/*)
  • Integrations Developer Guide (docs/en/integrations/*)
  • None of the above

Related issue

Part of elastic/apm-server#14933

Checklist

  • Product/Engineering Review
  • Writer Review

Follow-up tasks

Select one.

  • This PR does not need to be ported to another doc set because:
    • The concepts in this PR only apply to one doc set (serverless or stateful)
    • The PR contains edits to both doc sets (serverless and stateful)
  • This PR needs to be ported to another doc set:
    • Port to stateful docs: <link to PR or tracking issue>
    • Port to serverless docs: <link to PR or tracking issue>

@carsonip carsonip requested a review from a team as a code owner February 3, 2025 17:10
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Feb 3, 2025

It looks like this PR modifies one or more .asciidoc files. These files are being migrated to Markdown, and any changes merged now will be lost. See the migration guide for details.

Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Feb 3, 2025

A documentation preview will be available soon.

Request a new doc build by commenting
  • Rebuild this PR: run docs-build
  • Rebuild this PR and all Elastic docs: run docs-build rebuild

run docs-build is much faster than run docs-build rebuild. A rebuild should only be needed in rare situations.

If your PR continues to fail for an unknown reason, the doc build pipeline may be broken. Elastic employees can check the pipeline status here.

Copy link
Contributor

mergify bot commented Feb 3, 2025

This pull request does not have a backport label. Could you fix it @carsonip? 🙏
To fixup this pull request, you need to add the backport labels for the needed
branches, such as:

  • backport-/d./d is the label to automatically backport to the /d./d branch. /d is the digit
    NOTE: backport-skip has been added to this pull request.

@mergify mergify bot added the backport-skip Skip notification from the automated backport with mergify label Feb 3, 2025
@carsonip carsonip requested a review from simitt February 3, 2025 17:11
@carsonip carsonip added backport-9.0 Automated backport to the 9.0 branch and removed backport-skip Skip notification from the automated backport with mergify labels Feb 3, 2025
Copy link
Contributor

Warning

It looks like this PR modifies one or more .asciidoc files. These files are being migrated to Markdown, and any changes merged now will be lost. See the migration guide for details.

Copy link
Contributor

Warning

It looks like this PR modifies one or more .asciidoc files. These files are being migrated to Markdown, and any changes merged now will be lost. See the migration guide for details.

@carsonip
Copy link
Member Author

cc @colleenmcginnis this doc change should be released with 9.0

@bmorelli25
Copy link
Member

Replaced by elastic/docs-content#581.

@bmorelli25 bmorelli25 closed this Feb 24, 2025
bmorelli25 added a commit to elastic/docs-content that referenced this pull request Feb 24, 2025
This PR moves the changes introduced in
elastic/observability-docs#4814 by @carsonip to
our new 9.0 docs.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
backport-9.0 Automated backport to the 9.0 branch needs-writer-review
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants