1.2.5.1 #150
1.2.5.1 #150
Conversation
|
Caution Review failedThe pull request is closed. WalkthroughThe changes in this pull request primarily involve modifications to four files: Changes
Possibly related PRs
Poem
🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
Documentation and Community
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
mega_alerts.py (1)
591-591: LGTM! Consider a minor formatting improvement.The addition of ilvl items list logging improves visibility. For consistency with the previous lines, consider adding quotes around the list reference.
- + f"or ilvl items from list {mega_data.DESIRED_ILVL_LIST}\n" + + f"or ilvl items from list '{mega_data.DESIRED_ILVL_LIST}'\n"
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
mega_alerts.py(1 hunks)utils/mega_data_setup.py(1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
utils/mega_data_setup.py (1)
631-638: Verify handling of empty auction lists downstream.
The change to return empty auction lists instead of raising exceptions could affect downstream functionality. Please ensure that:
- The alerting system in
mega_alerts.pyproperly handles empty auction lists - No critical functionality depends on having commodity data for every scan
✅ Verification successful
Based on the results, I can generate the final response as we have clear evidence of empty auction list handling.
Empty auction lists are properly handled downstream ✓
The alerting system in mega_alerts.py has proper validation for empty auction lists:
- Explicit check
if not clean_auctions or len(clean_auctions) == 0: return - Additional validation
if len(auctions) == 0: return
The change to return empty auction lists instead of raising exceptions is safe as the downstream code gracefully handles this case by simply returning without processing.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for auction list handling in mega_alerts.py
echo "Checking auction list handling in mega_alerts.py:"
rg -A 5 "auctions\[" mega_alerts.py
# Search for empty list checks
echo "Checking empty list validation:"
rg -A 5 "len\(.*auctions" mega_alerts.py
Length of output: 1508
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (4)
.github/workflows/windows-exe-build.yml (1)
Line range hint
123-127: Consider fixing the macOS code signing.The commented-out macOS signing step indicates an unresolved certificate issue. This means macOS builds are being released unsigned, which could cause security warnings for users.
Would you like help with:
- Documenting the requirements for a valid macOS signing certificate?
- Creating a separate issue to track this technical debt?
AzerothAuctionAssassin.py (3)
Line range hint
8-21: Consider improving error handling and path validation.The current implementation has several areas that could be improved:
- The broad exception handling with silent pass could mask important errors
- The sys.path modification lacks validation, which could be a security concern
- The code structure could be cleaner than the current "if it isn't broken don't fix it" approach
Consider this safer implementation:
-AAA_VERSION = "1.2.5.1" +AAA_VERSION = "1.2.5.1" # Update this version number when releasing new versions -windowsApp_Path = None -try: - if sys.argv[1] == "run-from-windows-bin": - sys.path.append(f"{sys.argv[2]}") - sys.path.append(f"{sys.argv[3]}") - - windowsApp_Path = f"{sys.argv[2]}" - else: - pass -except Exception as ex: - pass -# i hate the way that looks but if it isnt broken dont fix it +def setup_windows_paths(): + """Configure paths when running from Windows binary.""" + if len(sys.argv) < 4: + return None + + if sys.argv[1] != "run-from-windows-bin": + return None + + # Validate paths before adding to sys.path + package_path = sys.argv[2] + lib_path = sys.argv[3] + + if not all(os.path.exists(p) for p in [package_path, lib_path]): + raise ValueError("Invalid paths provided for Windows binary execution") + + sys.path.extend([package_path, lib_path]) + return package_path + +try: + windowsApp_Path = setup_windows_paths() +except (IndexError, ValueError) as e: + print(f"Warning: Failed to setup Windows paths - {str(e)}") + windowsApp_Path = None
Line range hint
56-58: Use a more specific application identifier.The current Windows application user model ID is using generic placeholder values. This should be updated to reflect the actual application details.
-myappid = "mycompany.myproduct.subproduct.version" # arbitrary string +myappid = f"com.saddlebagexchange.azerothauctionassassin.{AAA_VERSION}"
Line range hint
60-1124: Consider breaking down the large App class into smaller components.The current implementation has a single large class handling multiple responsibilities. Consider:
- Separating UI components into individual classes (e.g., PetPage, ItemPage, etc.)
- Moving validation logic into a separate service layer
- Implementing a proper MVC/MVVM pattern
This would improve:
- Code maintainability
- Testing capabilities
- Feature development
- Code reuse
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
.github/workflows/windows-exe-build.yml(1 hunks)AzerothAuctionAssassin.py(1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
.github/workflows/windows-exe-build.yml (1)
4-4: Version bump follows semantic versioning.
The version increment from 1.2.5 to 1.2.5.1 follows semantic versioning principles, where the fourth number typically indicates a patch or build number. This is appropriate for minor fixes.
Let's verify version consistency across the project:
✅ Verification successful
Version number is consistently updated across the codebase
The version number 1.2.5.1 is consistently defined in both the GitHub Actions workflow (.github/workflows/windows-exe-build.yml) and the main application file (AzerothAuctionAssassin.py). No inconsistencies were found.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check version number consistency across the project
# Look for version strings in Python files and other configuration files
rg -g '!.git' "1\.2\.5\.1|1\.2\.5"
Length of output: 86
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (3)
utils/mega_data_setup.py (3)
560-564: Consider adding exponential backoff to retry strategy.While the increased retry attempts and exception handling are good improvements, the retry strategy could be enhanced further.
Consider adding exponential backoff to avoid overwhelming the API:
@retry( stop=stop_after_attempt(10), retry=retry_if_exception_type(requests.RequestException), + wait=wait_exponential(multiplier=1, min=4, max=10), retry_error_callback=lambda retry_state: {"auctions": []}, )
571-572: Consider dynamic sleep duration for rate limiting.The fixed 3-second sleep might not be optimal for all rate-limiting scenarios.
Consider extracting the retry-after header if available:
if req.status_code == 429: error_message = f"{req} BLIZZARD too many requests error on {self.REGION} {str(connectedRealmId)} realm data, skipping" - time.sleep(3) + retry_after = int(req.headers.get('Retry-After', 3)) + time.sleep(retry_after) raise Exception(error_message)
571-572: Consider centralizing error handling logic.The error handling logic is duplicated between
make_ah_api_requestandmake_commodity_ah_api_request.Consider extracting the common error handling logic into a helper method:
+ def _handle_api_error(self, req, region, realm_id, is_commodity=False): + if req.status_code == 429: + data_type = "commodities" if is_commodity else "realm" + error_message = f"{req} BLIZZARD too many requests error on {region} {data_type} data, skipping" + retry_after = int(req.headers.get('Retry-After', 3)) + time.sleep(retry_after) + raise Exception(error_message) + elif req.status_code != 200: + error_message = f"{req} BLIZZARD error getting {region} {str(realm_id)} realm data" + print(error_message) + time.sleep(1) + raise Exception(error_message)Then use it in both methods:
self._handle_api_error(req, self.REGION, connectedRealmId) # for AH API self._handle_api_error(req, self.REGION, connectedRealmId, is_commodity=True) # for commodity APIAlso applies to: 637-638
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
AzerothAuctionAssassin.py(4 hunks)utils/mega_data_setup.py(5 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
- AzerothAuctionAssassin.py
🔇 Additional comments (3)
utils/mega_data_setup.py (3)
227-227: LGTM: Increased retry attempts for access token.
The retry attempts for obtaining an access token have been increased from 3 to 10, which is a reasonable improvement for handling temporary API issues.
616-620: Ensure consistent retry configuration across API calls.
The retry configuration for commodity API requests matches the AH API requests, which is good for consistency.
637-638: Maintain consistent error handling across API calls.
The error handling for commodity API requests matches the AH API requests, which is good for consistency.
|
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Bug Fixes
Documentation
Chores
1.2.5to1.2.5.1.48to10.