Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

STSMACOM-886 provide LinkedUser component #1555

Merged
merged 8 commits into from
Jan 23, 2025
Merged

STSMACOM-886 provide LinkedUser component #1555

merged 8 commits into from
Jan 23, 2025

Conversation

zburke
Copy link
Member

@zburke zburke commented Jan 15, 2025

Link to a user-details record if permissions allow, or return a plaintext name.

Mocks shamelessly copied from ui-users.

Refs STSMACOM-886

Link to a user-details record if permissions allow,
or return a plaintext name.

Mocks shamelessly copied from ui-users.

Refs STSMACOM-886
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Jan 15, 2025

Bigtest Unit Test Results

  1 files  ±0    1 suites  ±0   14s ⏱️ ±0s
509 tests ±0  467 ✅ ±0  42 💤 ±0  0 ❌ ±0 
511 runs  ±0  469 ✅ ±0  42 💤 ±0  0 ❌ ±0 

Results for commit e7e0b7b. ± Comparison against base commit 21e7622.

♻️ This comment has been updated with latest results.

Omit files named like `.test.` (i.e. jest test files) when collecting
files to calculate BigTest coverage. BigTest chokes trying dereference
jest.
@zburke zburke requested a review from ryandberger January 15, 2025 13:36
@zburke zburke marked this pull request as ready for review January 15, 2025 13:36
@zburke zburke requested a review from a team as a code owner January 15, 2025 13:36
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Jan 15, 2025

Jest Unit Test Results

3 tests   3 ✅  4s ⏱️
1 suites  0 💤
1 files    0 ❌

Results for commit e7e0b7b.

♻️ This comment has been updated with latest results.

Copy link
Member

@ryandberger ryandberger left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Clean up lint, but looks good otherwise!

whoops; forgot to set `jest-test-command` so CI was inadvertently running both jest and BTOG under jest (where BTOG failed), in addition to separately running BTOG.
@zburke zburke merged commit e7b7764 into master Jan 23, 2025
16 checks passed
@zburke zburke deleted the STSMACOM-886 branch January 23, 2025 12:59
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants