Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix(list-field): initial value with effect dependencies (#104) #106

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Feb 14, 2024

Conversation

MiroslavPetrik
Copy link
Member

fixes #104

Copy link

codecov bot commented Feb 14, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Comparison is base (34bb722) 86.57% compared to head (6f82e0a) 90.53%.
Report is 3 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main     #106      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   86.57%   90.53%   +3.95%     
==========================================
  Files          97       99       +2     
  Lines        2466     2515      +49     
  Branches      193      196       +3     
==========================================
+ Hits         2135     2277     +142     
+ Misses        326      238      -88     
+ Partials        5        0       -5     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@MiroslavPetrik MiroslavPetrik merged commit 5a9db35 into main Feb 14, 2024
3 checks passed
@MiroslavPetrik MiroslavPetrik deleted the fix-104 branch February 14, 2024 12:21
github-actions bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 14, 2024
## [4.0.12](v4.0.11...v4.0.12) (2024-02-14)

### Bug Fixes

* **list-field:** initial value with effect dependencies ([#104](#104)) ([#106](#106)) ([5a9db35](5a9db35))
Copy link

🎉 This PR is included in version 4.0.12 🎉

The release is available on:

Your semantic-release bot 📦🚀

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

useFieldInitialValue with listField - Maximum update depth exceeded
1 participant