Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Bump omgidl-parser v1.0.4, omgidl-serialization v1.1.1 #160

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Apr 10, 2024
Merged

Bump omgidl-parser v1.0.4, omgidl-serialization v1.1.1 #160

merged 2 commits into from
Apr 10, 2024

Conversation

snosenzo
Copy link
Collaborator

@snosenzo snosenzo commented Apr 10, 2024 •
edited
Loading

update omgidl-parser package minor version (v1.0.3 -> v1.0.4).

Changes:

  • parser now supports field names with the same name as modules and structs.

update omgidl-serialization package minor version (v1.1.0 -> v1.1.1).

Changes:

  • message reader now assigns default values to non-optional mutable fields

@snosenzo snosenzo changed the title parser v1.0.4, serializationr v1.1.1 Bump parser v1.0.4, serialization v1.1.1 Apr 10, 2024
@snosenzo snosenzo changed the title Bump parser v1.0.4, serialization v1.1.1 Bump omgidl-parser v1.0.4, omgidl-serialization v1.1.1 Apr 10, 2024
@snosenzo snosenzo requested a review from achim-k April 10, 2024 16:02
@jtbandes
Copy link
Member

#161

jtbandes
jtbandes approved these changes Apr 10, 2024
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Member

@jtbandes jtbandes left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

:shipit:

@snosenzo snosenzo merged commit a6ab14b into main Apr 10, 2024
2 checks passed
@snosenzo snosenzo deleted the update-parser-and-serializer branch April 10, 2024 16:25
@Chastrlove
Copy link

@snosenzo @foxglove/ros2idl-parser should publish 0.3.3, it still use "@foxglove/omgidl-parser": "1.0.3",

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@jtbandes jtbandes jtbandes approved these changes

@achim-k achim-k Awaiting requested review from achim-k

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
3 participants
@snosenzo @jtbandes @Chastrlove