Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

chore: move playwright tests from main repo #1341

Open
wants to merge 3 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

ojeytonwilliams
Copy link
Contributor

Checklist:

The rationale is that these tests are of the mobile app, not the learn client. As such it makes more sense for them to be in this repo.

It's a little ugly, though, since we still need to import curriculum data from the main repo.

I converted the spec and test back to js since it did not seem worth configuring TS for two files. At least not right now.

@ojeytonwilliams ojeytonwilliams requested a review from a team as a code owner February 13, 2025 11:58
Copy link

socket-security bot commented Feb 13, 2025

New dependencies detected. Learn more about Socket for GitHub ↗︎

Package New capabilities Transitives Size Publisher
npm/@playwright/[email protected] None +3 11.2 MB dgozman-ms, mxschmitt, pavelfeldman, ...1 more
npm/[email protected] environment, filesystem 0 75.8 kB motdotla

View full report↗︎

@ojeytonwilliams
Copy link
Contributor Author

@Sembauke are the Flutter tests expected to fail or did I break something?

Comment on lines -8 to -9
paths:
- "mobile-app/**"
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Could you undo this change? We don't want the e2e tests to run for any changes within the mobile API code

@Nirajn2311
Copy link
Member

@Sembauke are the Flutter tests expected to fail or did I break something?

Yes, the app CI are expected to fail as forked PRs don't have access to secrets when running the action

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants