ioc_start.py: allow 'none' bridge in interfaces #47
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Iocage currently expects interfaces to be specified in the nic:bridge format, where bridge cannot be none. This results in iocage always creating a bridge to which VNET jail epair interfaces are added as members.
In a scenario where the user wants jails to be isolated on the data-link layer (OSI layer 2 / Ethernet) and use the host as a router, this bridge is unnecessery. It can also result in illegitimate cross-jail traffic being allowed, since pf filtering on bridge interfaces is disabled by default on FreeBSD systems (net.link.bridge.pfil_bridge=0).
Closes #44
Passing CI job: https://cirrus-ci.com/task/6547222509125632
For some reason the CI run using python packages instead of pre-built
pkg
ones is broken (incl. on the master branch) and indefinitely hangs ontests/functional_tests/0013_import_test.py::test_01_import_jail
, but it is unrelated to this PR.