fix: isCachingEnabled checks incorrect options object #58
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
tbazelczuk
requested review from
Borsuczio,
shirishapitta and
bchelkowski
and removed request for
a team
tbazelczuk
force-pushed
the
fix-enableCaching-options
branch
from
b3ff70b to
2ad03c1
Compare
bchelkowski
changed the title
github-actions bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 4, 2023
## [2.1.4](v2.1.3...v2.1.4) (2023-12-04) ### Bug Fixes * isCachingEnabled checks incorrect options object ([#58](#58)) ([dd109bb](dd109bb))
|
🎉 This PR is included in version 2.1.4 🎉 The release is available on: Your semantic-release bot 📦🚀 |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
How did you implement it:
isCachingEnabledaccess proper options objectHow can we verify it:
request
enableCachingoption set to false now disables cachingTodos:
Is this ready for review?: YES
Is it a breaking change?: NO