Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Sentiment analysis JSON example #193

Merged
merged 7 commits into from
Jun 5, 2024
Merged

Sentiment analysis JSON example #193

merged 7 commits into from
Jun 5, 2024

Conversation

shilpakancharla
Copy link
Collaborator

No description provided.

Copy link

Check out this pull request on  ReviewNB

See visual diffs & provide feedback on Jupyter Notebooks.


Powered by ReviewNB

@github-actions github-actions bot added status:awaiting review PR awaiting review from a maintainer component:examples Issues/PR referencing examples folder labels Jun 3, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

@MarkDaoust MarkDaoust left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I'm impressed at how copnsistently these probabilities add up to one.

But it might be good to ask it for logits so it doesn't have to do that math in it's head.

@MarkDaoust MarkDaoust merged commit 4f7fd25 into main Jun 5, 2024
3 checks passed
Vruddhi18 pushed a commit to Vruddhi18/cookbook that referenced this pull request Dec 2, 2024
* Add example for adding context information for prompting

* delete

* add self ask for prompting

* Add sentiment analysis JSON example

* Update colab link

* Update colab link for self ask

* License header for self ask fixed
@markmcd markmcd deleted the sentiment_analysis branch February 3, 2025 06:21
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
component:examples Issues/PR referencing examples folder status:awaiting review PR awaiting review from a maintainer
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants