new PMP canonical type and extend RMM abstract type #1001
Conversation
adelin-diac
changed the title
| implements: | ||
| - PMP | ||
| - CPC | ||
| - RMM |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
RMM is typically reserved for components that perform heating/cooling. It is odd to see this used on a pump.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I have updated to PMP_SS_RMM_CPC for now. If its prefered to not use RMM, PMP_VSC_CPC could possible work if run_command and speed_percentage_command are marked missing, but unsure if using VSC and marking speed_percentage_command as missing would be valid.
| - PMP | ||
| - SS | ||
| - RMM | ||
| - CPC |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
CPC should be used on non-PMP types. For example, if a boiler had a pump that was internal to the unit. Can you please clarify; are you trying to model a stand-alone pump or a circulation pump that is inside of another piece of equipment?
|
@adelin-diac please clarify if this pump is a stand-alone pump or if it is part of another piece of equipment (for example: a circulation pump on a boiler). If this is a stand-alone pump, you cannot use Can you please expand on the need to use |
|
@cstirdivant apologies about delay with this device. There was some slight misunderstanding at the time of modelling this device. It is actually an air source heat pump, which serves domestic hot water. It has a circulation pump on it. Which type would be best to use in this case, PMP or create a general type for ASHP? |
|
In terms of the
|
No description provided.