Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Release Google.Cloud.Dataplex.V1 version 3.6.0 #14243

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Feb 10, 2025

Conversation

jskeet
Copy link
Collaborator

@jskeet jskeet commented Feb 10, 2025

Changes in this release:

New features

Documentation improvements

Changes in this release:

### New features

- Added value `NONE` to  the `SyncMode` enum ([commit e7d4c50](e7d4c50))

### Documentation improvements

- Modified various comments ([commit e7d4c50](e7d4c50))
@jskeet jskeet requested a review from a team as a code owner February 10, 2025 16:45
@jskeet jskeet added autorelease: pending automerge: exact Summon MOG for automerging, but approvals need to be against the latest commit labels Feb 10, 2025
Copy link

Pull request diff results
Finding changes in Google.Cloud.Dataplex.V1...
Comparing old and new versions (by source)
Diff level: Identical

Comparing with previous NuGet package
Checking compatibility for Google.Cloud.Dataplex.V1 version 3.6.0
Differences from 3.5.0
Minor changes:
Enum 'MetadataJob.Types.ImportJobSpec.Types.SyncMode' entry 'None' added.

Diff level: Minor

Finished comparisons for Google.Cloud.Dataplex.V1

@gcf-merge-on-green gcf-merge-on-green bot merged commit 105903f into main Feb 10, 2025
11 of 12 checks passed
@gcf-merge-on-green gcf-merge-on-green bot removed the automerge: exact Summon MOG for automerging, but approvals need to be against the latest commit label Feb 10, 2025
@gcf-merge-on-green gcf-merge-on-green bot deleted the release-pr-20250210T164544Z branch February 10, 2025 20:06
@yoshi-automation
Copy link
Contributor

  • Created release for Google.Cloud.Dataplex.V1-3.6.0

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants