transfer maintainers to consul, boundary, and nomad

[claire-labry]

This PR transfers maintainership to the Consul, Nomad, and Boundary teams as the Release Engineering team are not the correct maintainers for this repository.

[analogue]

👍 from consul-core team.

[jefferai]

I don't believe this is the right set. Probably it should be @mkeeler and myself?

[analogue]

I don't believe this is the right set. Probably it should be @mkeeler and myself?

For sustainability, IMO teams/groups/aliases should be owners, not individuals. Teams should have the context to redirect to individuals when necessary.

[mkeeler]

On the one hand @jefferai and myself have the most background in this repo outside of Mitchell. But whether we want to have individuals as code owners I am less certain. So far with other libraries shared amongst multiple products we seem to have been successful with developers new to a projects finding the right people to double check their assumptions for their first PRs.

I think the benefits of team ownership probably outweigh the risks of letting something through that we shouldn't.

[jefferai]

So far with other libraries shared amongst multiple products we seem to have been successful with developers new to a projects finding the right people to double check their assumptions for their first PRs.

This does not match with my experience at all, which is why I suggested me and Matt.

I would suggest that the two of us should be codeowners but the comments in the file should mention that it is used by the various projects.

[dekimsey]

LGTM :)