-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4.7k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
FourPointOh - remove from services A-I with low find counts #28021
Conversation
internal/services/databricks/databricks_customer_managed_key_resource.go
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
internal/services/datafactory/data_factory_integration_runtime_azure_resource.go
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
…_azure_resource.go Co-authored-by: stephybun <[email protected]>
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Looks good except for having the deprecated resource be under a 5.0 flag check
"azurerm_databricks_workspace_root_dbfs_customer_managed_key": resourceDatabricksWorkspaceRootDbfsCustomerManagedKey(), | ||
"azurerm_databricks_virtual_network_peering": resourceDatabricksVirtualNetworkPeering(), | ||
"azurerm_databricks_workspace_customer_managed_key": resourceDatabricksWorkspaceCustomerManagedKey(), // TODO: Remove in 5.0 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This should be in a !features.FivePointOhBeta()
check so we don't get into the same situation of forgetting to remove it
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
oh good call!
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
One more minor thing
Co-authored-by: Matthew Frahry <[email protected]>
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM!
This is a (please select all that apply):
Related Issue(s)
Fixes #0000
Note
If this PR changes meaningfully during the course of review please update the title and description as required.