Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Exclude records with only suppressed holdings/items/portfolios from "DigiBib hbz Verbundkatalog" collection. #2078

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

blackwinter
Copy link
Member

Mimics similar behaviour in DigiBib IntrOX (Limetrans; relevant Jira issues: DOX-1354, DOX-1568, DOX-1622).

See #2077 for alternate proposal (skip these records altogether).

…DigiBib hbz Verbundkatalog" collection.

Mimics similar behaviour in DigiBib IntrOX (Limetrans; relevant Jira issues: DOX-1354, DOX-1568, DOX-1622).

See #2077 for alternate proposal (skip these records altogether).
@blackwinter
Copy link
Member Author

The question remains: Do we need tests for these cases?

@blackwinter
Copy link
Member Author

We've decided not to go forward with this change (for the time being). Sorry for the noise, everyone.

@blackwinter blackwinter deleted the skipSuppressedRecordsForDigiBib branch September 26, 2024 12:03
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
Status: Done
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants