Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

PR featuring configuration, optional impersonation support, and optional last login support #17

Open
wants to merge 17 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

andylash
Copy link

Hi,

I meant to do this before, but got a bit distracted, but I needed last login support today, so I figured I try and do it in a useful way for the main branch. I added a general configuration facility, but made it optional so I thought that would be more in the spirit of what library's general feel is. Anyway, happy to hear feedback if you don't like the approach.

cheers,
andy

@hharnisc
Copy link
Owner

I finally got some time to test the features you've proposed in the request. Everything seems to be working for me -- I'm going to make a few tweaks to the UI and mess around with the configuration stuff. After seeing user-status it seems more like an opt out rather than opt in (seems useful). Still debating on wether the impersonation stuff should be opt out or in.

@andylash
Copy link
Author

User-status is pretty awesome actually, but it does depend on 2 other
packages user-status and roles, so it's more heavy. Impersonation is
something I use almost constantly for support and I really like it, but to
make it have meteor magic you have to put your subscription in an autorun.

Anyway, open to however you want to go here.

cheers,
andy

On Wed, Jun 11, 2014 at 11:05 PM, Harrison Harnisch <
[email protected]> wrote:

I finally got some time to test the features you've proposed in the
request. Everything seems to be working for me -- I'm going to make a few
tweaks to the UI and mess around with the configuration stuff. After seeing
user-status it seems more like an opt out rather than opt in (seems
useful). Still debating on wether the impersonation stuff should be opt out
or in.


Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
#17 (comment)
.

@hharnisc
Copy link
Owner

hharnisc commented Feb 9, 2015

How has this been working out for you in your project? I pull this locally and played around with it and it all looks pretty great. Do you mind if I merge in these changes?

@andylash
Copy link
Author

Oh sure, absolutely. I actually have a ton of other changes (though roles are currently broken in my fork as I haven't gotten around to dealing with roles within groups, a roles feature I'm now using). Stuff like server side pagination.

Anyway, feel free to merge or if you like I can do some clean up and then give you a newer cleaner PR.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants