Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add support for Shelly Flood gen4 #136981

Merged
merged 6 commits into from
Feb 3, 2025

Conversation

chemelli74
Copy link
Contributor

Proposed change

Add support for Shelly Flood gen4 sensors

Type of change

  • Dependency upgrade
  • Bugfix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
  • New integration (thank you!)
  • New feature (which adds functionality to an existing integration)
  • Deprecation (breaking change to happen in the future)
  • Breaking change (fix/feature causing existing functionality to break)
  • Code quality improvements to existing code or addition of tests

Additional information

  • This PR fixes or closes issue: fixes #
  • This PR is related to issue:
  • Link to documentation pull request:

Checklist

  • The code change is tested and works locally.
  • Local tests pass. Your PR cannot be merged unless tests pass
  • There is no commented out code in this PR.
  • I have followed the development checklist
  • I have followed the perfect PR recommendations
  • The code has been formatted using Ruff (ruff format homeassistant tests)
  • Tests have been added to verify that the new code works.

If user exposed functionality or configuration variables are added/changed:

If the code communicates with devices, web services, or third-party tools:

  • The manifest file has all fields filled out correctly.
    Updated and included derived files by running: python3 -m script.hassfest.
  • New or updated dependencies have been added to requirements_all.txt.
    Updated by running python3 -m script.gen_requirements_all.
  • For the updated dependencies - a link to the changelog, or at minimum a diff between library versions is added to the PR description.

To help with the load of incoming pull requests:

@home-assistant
Copy link

Hey there @balloob, @bieniu, @thecode, @bdraco, mind taking a look at this pull request as it has been labeled with an integration (shelly) you are listed as a code owner for? Thanks!

Code owner commands

Code owners of shelly can trigger bot actions by commenting:

  • @home-assistant close Closes the pull request.
  • @home-assistant rename Awesome new title Renames the pull request.
  • @home-assistant reopen Reopen the pull request.
  • @home-assistant unassign shelly Removes the current integration label and assignees on the pull request, add the integration domain after the command.
  • @home-assistant add-label needs-more-information Add a label (needs-more-information, problem in dependency, problem in custom component) to the pull request.
  • @home-assistant remove-label needs-more-information Remove a label (needs-more-information, problem in dependency, problem in custom component) on the pull request.

@chemelli74 chemelli74 changed the title add support for Flood gen4 Add support for Shelly Flood gen4 Jan 31, 2025
name="Error",
device_class=BinarySensorDeviceClass.PROBLEM,
entity_category=EntityCategory.DIAGNOSTIC,
extra_state_attributes=lambda value: {"error": value},
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think we should avoid expanding the usage of extra_state_attributes, currently we have only 3 usages of extra_state_attributes, all in Gen1 which added in very early stages of the integration.
If this information is needed we should create another entity with it.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

We can go with either approaches, but for me the error info is so related to the binary sensor status that makes more sense to have then in a single "place".

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

If we know that the errors value can contain a list of errors then we should implement a separate entity for each type of error.

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The documentation mentions a cable_unplugged error:

obraz

Copy link
Member

@bieniu bieniu left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good, thanks

@edenhaus edenhaus merged commit cce6c73 into home-assistant:dev Feb 3, 2025
32 checks passed
@chemelli74 chemelli74 deleted the chemelli74-flood-gen4 branch February 3, 2025 13:09
@thecode thecode mentioned this pull request Feb 3, 2025
19 tasks
lboue pushed a commit to lboue/ha_core that referenced this pull request Feb 3, 2025
@github-actions github-actions bot locked and limited conversation to collaborators Feb 4, 2025
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants