message api for 2.2.0 #134
Conversation
📝 Walkthrough📝 WalkthroughWalkthroughThe changes in this pull request involve updates to the Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)sequenceDiagram
participant User
participant API
participant SDK
User->>SDK: sendMessage(payload)
SDK->>SDK: Validate payload
alt Validation failed
SDK-->>User: Error message
else Validation passed
SDK->>API: Send message with destination
API-->>SDK: Response
alt API error
SDK-->>User: sdkApiError
else Unexpected error
SDK-->>User: ZodError
else Success
SDK-->>User: Success message
end
end
📜 Recent review detailsConfiguration used: CodeRabbit UI 📒 Files selected for processing (2)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (2)
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (4)
src/api/messages/sendMessage.ts (2)
Line range hint
52-71: LGTM: Improved error handling with a suggestion.The enhanced error handling significantly improves the function's robustness. Using specific error types (sdkApiError, ZodError) allows for more precise error handling by the caller. The approach of checking for expected API error structure before falling back to ZodError is logical and well-implemented.
Consider adding a custom error type for the case when the response status is > 499. This would provide more consistency in error handling:
class UnexpectedServerError extends Error { constructor(statusText: string) { super(`Unexpected server error: ${statusText}`); this.name = 'UnexpectedServerError'; } } // Then in the error handling: if (rawResponse.status > 499) { throw new UnexpectedServerError(rawResponse.statusText); }
Line range hint
1-71: Overall improvements are solid. Consider updating documentation.The changes to the
sendMessagefunction significantly improve its robustness, error handling, and user guidance. The introduction of thedestinationvariable, enhanced error checking, and deprecation warnings all contribute to a more reliable and user-friendly function.To fully complete these improvements, consider updating the function's JSDoc comments to reflect the changes:
- Document the new
destinationproperty in theSendMessagePayloadType.- Add
@throwsannotations to describe the possible error types that can be thrown.- Update any existing documentation or README files that describe this function's usage.
This will ensure that the documentation stays in sync with the implementation and helps users understand the new behavior and error handling.
src/types/messages.ts (2)
21-23: Consider adding documentation for recipient fields.The changes to
peerId,peerAddress, anddestinationfields provide more flexibility but might lead to confusion about their usage.To improve clarity, consider:
- Adding JSDoc comments to explain the purpose and usage of each field.
- Documenting any prioritization or fallback logic if multiple fields are provided.
- Providing examples of when to use each field or combination of fields.
Example documentation:
/** * @property {string} [peerId] - The unique identifier of the peer. Use when... * @property {string} [peerAddress] - The address of the peer. Use when... * @property {string} [destination] - The destination identifier. Use when... * Note: At least one of these properties must be provided. */
26-29: Approve refinement with a minor suggestion.The added refinement effectively ensures that at least one way of specifying the recipient is provided. The error message is clear and informative.
Consider using object destructuring for a slightly more concise implementation:
.refine( ({ peerId, peerAddress, destination }) => !!(peerId || peerAddress || destination), 'Either destination, peerId or peerAddress have to be filled in.' );This change is optional and doesn't affect functionality, but it might improve readability.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (3)
- package.json (1 hunks)
- src/api/messages/sendMessage.ts (1 hunks)
- src/types/messages.ts (1 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
- package.json
🧰 Additional context used
🔇 Additional comments (4)
src/api/messages/sendMessage.ts (2)
16-19: LGTM: Improved input handling and error checking.The introduction of the
destinationvariable consolidates multiple input options, improving code clarity. The error handling ensures that at least one destination option is provided, which is a good practice.
30-30: LGTM: Consistent use of the newdestinationvariable.The update of the
bodyobject to use the newdestinationvariable ensures consistency in how the destination is handled throughout the function. This change aligns well with the earlier introduction of thedestinationvariable.src/types/messages.ts (2)
19-29: Verify impact and update documentation for SendMessagePayload changes.The changes to
SendMessagePayloadprovide more flexibility but might affect existing code.Please consider the following:
- Verify that all code using
SendMessagePayloadhas been updated to accommodate these changes.- Update any API documentation or README files to reflect the new schema and usage.
- Consider adding migration guides if these changes might break existing integrations.
To help verify the impact, you can run:
#!/bin/bash # Search for usage of SendMessagePayload in the codebase rg -n 'SendMessagePayload' --type ts # Search for usage of peerId, peerAddress, or destination in message-related functions rg -n '(?i)function.*message.*\((.*?)(peerId|peerAddress|destination)' --type tsReview the results to ensure all relevant code has been updated.
19-19: Verify the rationale for changing the minimum tag value.The minimum value for
taghas been increased from 0 to 1024. This change might break backward compatibility if existing code uses tag values between 0 and 1023.Could you please clarify the reasoning behind this change? Also, consider the following:
- Are there any existing messages with tags < 1024 that need to be migrated?
- Does this change align with any specific protocol or standard?
- How does this impact existing clients or systems interacting with this API?
To verify the usage of tag values in the codebase, you can run:
✅ Verification successful
Minimum tag value change verified: No usages below 1024 found.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for usage of tag values less than 1024 rg -n '(?i)tag.*(?:0|[1-9]\d{0,2}|10[0-1]\d|102[0-3])' --type tsLength of output: 1132
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for 'tag' definitions with a minimum value less than 1024 in TypeScript files rg -n 'tag:\s*z\.number\(\)\.min\((\d{1,3})\)' --type tsLength of output: 58
src/api/messages/sendMessage.ts
Outdated
| if(payload.destination && (payload.peerId) || payload.peerAddress) { | ||
| console.log('You provided multiple destination/peerId/peerAddress attributes.\nOnly destination property will be used.\nPlease only use destination property in sendMessage function.') | ||
| } else if (payload.peerId || payload.peerAddress) { | ||
| console.log('Properties peerId and peerAddress are deprecated. Please only use destination property in sendMessage function.') | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Consider using a more robust deprecation warning mechanism.
While the console logs provide useful information about deprecated properties and multiple attribute usage, consider using a more robust deprecation warning mechanism. This could involve:
- Using a dedicated deprecation warning function that can be easily tracked and managed.
- Emitting deprecation warnings that can be captured by IDEs or testing frameworks.
- Documenting the deprecations in the function's JSDoc comments.
This approach would make the warnings more visible and easier to manage in the long term.
Here's an example of how you could implement this:
import { deprecate } from 'util';
/**
* @deprecated Use 'destination' instead of 'peerId' or 'peerAddress'
*/
const warnDeprecated = deprecate(() => {},
'Properties peerId and peerAddress are deprecated. Please only use destination property in sendMessage function.'
);
// In the function body:
if (payload.peerId || payload.peerAddress) {
warnDeprecated();
}
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Bug Fixes
SendMessagePayloadto ensure better data integrity.Documentation
destinationproperty.