Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

uHTTP playground testing #45

Draft
wants to merge 12 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from
Draft

uHTTP playground testing #45

wants to merge 12 commits into from

Conversation

mjadach-iv
Copy link
Collaborator

@mjadach-iv mjadach-iv commented Oct 14, 2024

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Added new environment variables for enhanced configuration options.
    • Updated application name and short name in the manifest for better branding.
  • Dependencies

    • Updated @hoprnet/uhttp-lib to version 4.0.0-beta.0.
    • Introduced new development dependencies: cheerio and dotenv.
  • Build Process

    • Enhanced the build script with additional commands for improved functionality.

Copy link

vercel bot commented Oct 14, 2024

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎

Name Status Preview Comments Updated (UTC)
hub-hoprnet-org ✅ Ready (Inspect) Visit Preview 💬 Add feedback Oct 24, 2024 10:48pm

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Oct 14, 2024

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

The changes consist of updates to three files: .env.example, package.json, and public/manifest.json. The .env.example file has been modified to include three new environment variables. The package.json file has seen updates to dependencies, scripts, and the addition of new development dependencies. Lastly, the public/manifest.json file has had its short_name and name properties updated to reflect new branding.

Changes

File Change Summary
.env.example Added variables: uClientId, uForceZeroHop, discoveryPlatformEndpoint.
package.json Updated @hoprnet/uhttp-lib version from 3.8.0-beta.9 to 4.0.0-beta.0; added cheerio (^1.0.0) and dotenv (^16.4.5) to devDependencies; updated build script and added build:uHTTP script.
public/manifest.json Updated short_name from "React App" to "hub-hoprnet-org" and name from "Create React App Sample" to "HOPR

📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 513a736 and 6cdbf73.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • package.json (3 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
  • package.json

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 5

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (4)
.env.example (4)

1-1: Consider adding a comment to explain the expected format of uClientId.

While using "XXXX" as a placeholder is common, it would be helpful to provide more context about the expected format or length of the client ID. This can help users understand how to properly configure this variable.

Consider adding a comment like this:

-uClientId = XXXX
+# uClientId: A unique identifier for the client (e.g., a UUID or a string of specific length)
+uClientId = XXXX

2-2: Add a comment explaining the purpose of uForceZeroHop.

The purpose of this boolean flag is not immediately clear from its name. It would be beneficial to add a comment explaining what "zero hop" means in this context and the implications of setting this flag to true.

Consider adding a comment like this:

-uForceZeroHop = true
+# uForceZeroHop: When set to true, forces the use of zero-hop mode (explain what this means and its implications)
+uForceZeroHop = true

3-3: Add a comment for discoveryPlatformEndpoint and consider environment-specific values.

While the URL is clear, it would be helpful to add a comment explaining the purpose of this discovery platform endpoint. Additionally, consider providing alternative endpoints for different environments (e.g., development, staging, production).

Consider modifying the line like this:

-discoveryPlatformEndpoint = https://discovery-platform.hoprnet.link
+# discoveryPlatformEndpoint: URL for the discovery platform service
+# Production: https://discovery-platform.hoprnet.link
+# Staging: https://staging-discovery-platform.hoprnet.link
+# Development: http://localhost:3000
+discoveryPlatformEndpoint = https://discovery-platform.hoprnet.link

1-3: Add a header comment and usage instructions to the .env.example file.

To improve the usability of this example file, consider adding a header comment explaining its purpose and instructions on how to use it. This will help developers understand how to properly set up their environment.

Consider adding the following at the beginning of the file:

+# .env.example
+# This file serves as a template for setting up environment variables for the application.
+# To use:
+# 1. Copy this file and rename it to .env
+# 2. Replace the placeholder values with your actual configuration
+# 3. Ensure the .env file is not committed to version control (it should be in .gitignore)
+
 uClientId = XXXX
 uForceZeroHop = true
 discoveryPlatformEndpoint = https://discovery-platform.hoprnet.link
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 5c44f82 and 19f8f40.

⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
  • yarn.lock is excluded by !**/yarn.lock, !**/*.lock
📒 Files selected for processing (6)
  • .env.example (1 hunks)
  • package.json (3 hunks)
  • scripts/post-build-uHTTP.js (1 hunks)
  • scripts/post-build.js (0 hunks)
  • scripts/prepare-build-hub.js (0 hunks)
  • scripts/prepare-build-node.js (0 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (3)
  • scripts/post-build.js
  • scripts/prepare-build-hub.js
  • scripts/prepare-build-node.js
🧰 Additional context used
🔇 Additional comments (2)
package.json (2)

51-52: Document uHTTP integration and verify build process

The changes introduce uHTTP-related functionality, including new build steps and dependencies. This represents a significant change to the project's build process.

  1. Please update the project documentation to reflect these changes, including:

    • The purpose and usage of the new build:uHTTP script
    • Any new environment variables or configuration needed for uHTTP
    • How these changes affect the development and deployment workflow
  2. To verify the impact of these changes on the build process, please run the following script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the new build process and its output

# Run the new build script
npm run build:uHTTP

# Check if the build was successful
if [ $? -eq 0 ]; then
  echo "Build successful. Checking for expected output..."
  
  # Check for the existence of expected build artifacts
  if [ -d "dist" ]; then
    echo "dist directory exists."
    ls -l dist
  else
    echo "Error: dist directory not found."
  fi
  
  # Check for any uHTTP-specific files or modifications
  echo "Checking for uHTTP-specific files or modifications:"
  find dist -type f -name "*uHTTP*"
  
else
  echo "Build failed. Please check the build output for errors."
fi

This script will help ensure that the new build process works as expected and produces the necessary artifacts for uHTTP integration.

Also applies to: 82-82, 91-92


82-82: Approve new dependency and clarify usage of others

The addition of @hoprnet/uhttp-lib is justified as it's used in the new build scripts.

Could you please clarify the intended usage of cheerio and dotenv in this project? These dependencies are not used in the package.json file directly, so it would be helpful to understand their purpose.

To verify the usage of these new dependencies, you can run the following script:

This will help identify where these dependencies are being used in the project.

Also applies to: 91-92

✅ Verification successful

Dependencies Usage Confirmed

All added dependencies (@hoprnet/uhttp-lib, cheerio, and dotenv) are utilized within scripts/post-build-uHTTP.js.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for usage of new dependencies in the project

echo "Searching for usage of @hoprnet/uhttp-lib:"
rg --type js --type ts "@hoprnet/uhttp-lib"

echo "\nSearching for usage of cheerio:"
rg --type js --type ts "cheerio"

echo "\nSearching for usage of dotenv:"
rg --type js --type ts "dotenv"

Length of output: 233


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for usage of new dependencies in the project

echo "Searching for usage of @hoprnet/uhttp-lib:"
rg --type js --type ts "@hoprnet/uhttp-lib"

echo "\nSearching for usage of cheerio:"
rg --type js --type ts "cheerio"

echo "\nSearching for usage of dotenv:"
rg --type js --type ts "dotenv"

Length of output: 716

package.json Outdated
Comment on lines 51 to 52
"build": "tsc && vite build && node ./node_modules/@hoprnet/uhttp-lib/service-worker/post-build-uHTTP.js",
"build:uHTTP": "tsc && vite build && node ./node_modules/@hoprnet/uhttp-lib/service-worker/post-build-uHTTP.js",
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Consider consolidating duplicate build scripts

The build and build:uHTTP scripts are identical. This duplication may lead to maintenance issues in the future.

Consider keeping only one of these scripts or differentiating them if they serve different purposes. If build:uHTTP is intended for a specific use case, you could refactor it to use the build script:

"build": "tsc && vite build && node ./node_modules/@hoprnet/uhttp-lib/service-worker/post-build-uHTTP.js",
"build:uHTTP": "npm run build"

This approach maintains the functionality while reducing duplication.


$('head > script').remove();
$('head > link').remove();
$('').add();
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚠️ Potential issue

Remove unnecessary code: $('').add();

The line $('').add(); doesn't have any effect and can be safely removed.

Apply this diff:

-        $('').add();
📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change
$('').add();

return output;
};

function preparePersonalasiedStartingScript(elements) {
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚠️ Potential issue

Correct the typo in function name

There's a typo in the function name preparePersonalasiedStartingScript. It should be preparePersonalizedStartingScript.

Apply this diff:

-function preparePersonalasiedStartingScript(elements) {
+function preparePersonalizedStartingScript(elements) {
📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change
function preparePersonalasiedStartingScript(elements) {
function preparePersonalizedStartingScript(elements) {

const elements = getScriptsAndLinks(originalHTML);
const newHTML = prepareNewIndexHTML(originalHTML);
saveIndexHTML(newHTML);
preparePersonalasiedStartingScript(elements);
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚠️ Potential issue

Update function call to match corrected function name

After correcting the function name, ensure you update the function call accordingly.

Apply this diff:

-    preparePersonalasiedStartingScript(elements);
+    preparePersonalizedStartingScript(elements);
📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change
preparePersonalasiedStartingScript(elements);
preparePersonalizedStartingScript(elements);

Comment on lines 88 to 98
elements.map((element, index) =>{
output = output + ` const s${index} = document.createElement("${element.tag}");\n`
const attributes = element.attributes;
const attributeNames = Object.keys(attributes);
for(let i = 0; i < attributeNames.length; i++) {
const key = attributeNames[i];
const value = attributes[key];
output = output + ` s${index}.${key} = "${value}";\n`
}
output = output + ` document.querySelector('head').append(s${index});\n`
})
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Use forEach instead of map for side effects

You're using elements.map without returning a new array. Since you're performing side effects, it's better to use elements.forEach.

Apply this diff:

-    elements.map((element, index) =>{
+    elements.forEach((element, index) =>{
📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change
elements.map((element, index) =>{
output = output + ` const s${index} = document.createElement("${element.tag}");\n`
const attributes = element.attributes;
const attributeNames = Object.keys(attributes);
for(let i = 0; i < attributeNames.length; i++) {
const key = attributeNames[i];
const value = attributes[key];
output = output + ` s${index}.${key} = "${value}";\n`
}
output = output + ` document.querySelector('head').append(s${index});\n`
})
elements.forEach((element, index) =>{
output = output + ` const s${index} = document.createElement("${element.tag}");\n`
const attributes = element.attributes;
const attributeNames = Object.keys(attributes);
for(let i = 0; i < attributeNames.length; i++) {
const key = attributeNames[i];
const value = attributes[key];
output = output + ` s${index}.${key} = "${value}";\n`
}
output = output + ` document.querySelector('head').append(s${index});\n`
})

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
public/manifest.json (1)

2-3: LGTM! Consider adding a description field.

The changes to short_name and name are appropriate and align with the project's identity. The short_name is now more specific to the project, and the name provides a clear, branded title for the application.

Consider adding a description field to provide more context about the application. For example:

{
  "short_name": "hub-hoprnet-org",
  "name": "HOPR | Staking Hub",
  "description": "Staking hub for the HOPR network",
  ...
}

This addition can improve the manifest's completeness and potentially aid in SEO and app store listings if applicable.

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between d5240e1 and 6c23a5f.

⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
  • yarn.lock is excluded by !**/yarn.lock, !**/*.lock
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • package.json (3 hunks)
  • public/manifest.json (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🔇 Additional comments (2)
package.json (2)

52-53: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Refactor duplicate build scripts

The build and build:uHTTP scripts are identical, which may lead to maintenance issues in the future. This duplication was previously flagged in a past review.

Consider refactoring these scripts to reduce duplication:

-  "build": "tsc && vite build && uhttp-post-build-react",
-  "build:uHTTP": "tsc && vite build && uhttp-post-build-react",
+  "build": "tsc && vite build && uhttp-post-build-react",
+  "build:uHTTP": "npm run build"

This approach maintains the functionality while reducing duplication and improving maintainability.


91-92: Provide context for new dev dependencies

Two new development dependencies have been added:

  • cheerio (^1.0.0)
  • dotenv (^16.4.5)

Could you please provide more context on how these new dependencies are being used in the project? This information will help in understanding the purpose of these additions and ensure they are necessary for the development process.

To help understand the usage of these new dependencies, please run the following script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for usage of new dependencies in the project

echo "Searching for cheerio usage:"
rg --type js --type ts 'require\(["\']cheerio["\']\)|import.*from.*["\']cheerio["\']\|cheerio\.' -A 5

echo "Searching for dotenv usage:"
rg --type js --type ts 'require\(["\']dotenv["\']\)|import.*from.*["\']dotenv["\']\|dotenv\.' -A 5

package.json Outdated
@@ -7,6 +7,7 @@
"@emotion/styled": "^11.11.0",
"@fontsource/roboto": "^5.0.0",
"@hoprnet/hopr-sdk": "2.1.0-beta.30",
"@hoprnet/uhttp-lib": "3.8.0-beta.3",
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Codebase verification

Dependency version @hoprnet/uhttp-lib v3.8.0-beta.3 does not exist

The specified version v3.8.0-beta.3 for @hoprnet/uhttp-lib does not exist in the repository's releases or tags. Please verify and update the dependency to a valid version.

🔗 Analysis chain

Verify the impact of the @hoprnet/uhttp-lib update

The @hoprnet/uhttp-lib package has been updated from version 3.8.0-beta.2 to 3.8.0-beta.3. While this is a minor version update, it's important to ensure that it doesn't introduce any breaking changes or unexpected behavior.

Please run the following script to check for any breaking changes or significant updates in the changelog:

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for breaking changes or significant updates in @hoprnet/uhttp-lib

# Fetch the changelog or release notes
changelog=$(gh api repos/hoprnet/uhttp-lib/releases/tags/v3.8.0-beta.3 --jq .body)

# Check for keywords indicating breaking changes or significant updates
if echo "$changelog" | grep -iE "breaking|major|significant|important|attention|warning"; then
  echo "Potential breaking changes or significant updates found in @hoprnet/uhttp-lib v3.8.0-beta.3:"
  echo "$changelog"
else
  echo "No obvious breaking changes found in @hoprnet/uhttp-lib v3.8.0-beta.3"
fi

# Compare the API of the two versions
npm diff --diff=@hoprnet/[email protected] --diff=@hoprnet/[email protected]

Length of output: 244


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for breaking changes or significant updates in @hoprnet/uhttp-lib

# Fetch the changelog or release notes
changelog=$(gh api repos/hoprnet/uhttp-lib/releases/tags/v3.8.0-beta.3 --jq .body)

# Check for keywords indicating breaking changes or significant updates
if echo "$changelog" | grep -iE "breaking|major|significant|important|attention|warning"; then
  echo "Potential breaking changes or significant updates found in @hoprnet/uhttp-lib v3.8.0-beta.3:"
  echo "$changelog"
else
  echo "No obvious breaking changes found in @hoprnet/uhttp-lib v3.8.0-beta.3"
fi

# Display differences between the two versions
gh api repos/hoprnet/uhttp-lib/compare/v3.8.0-beta.2...v3.8.0-beta.3 --jq '.files[] | {filename: .filename, status: .status}'

Length of output: 883


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: List all releases and tags for @hoprnet/uhttp-lib to verify the existence of v3.8.0-beta.3

# Fetch and list all release tags
echo "Fetching all release tags for @hoprnet/uhttp-lib:"
gh api repos/hoprnet/uhttp-lib/releases --per-page 100 --jq '.[].tag_name' || echo "Failed to fetch releases."

# Fetch and list all git tags
echo "Fetching all git tags for @hoprnet/uhttp-lib repository:"
gh api repos/hoprnet/uhttp-lib/tags --per-page 100 --jq '.[].name' || echo "Failed to fetch git tags."

Length of output: 3237


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: List all releases and tags for @hoprnet/uhttp-lib to verify the existence of v3.8.0-beta.3

# Fetch and list all release tags
echo "Fetching all release tags for @hoprnet/uhttp-lib:"
gh api repos/hoprnet/uhttp-lib/releases --paginate --jq '.[].tag_name' || echo "Failed to fetch releases."

# Fetch and list all git tags
echo "Fetching all git tags for @hoprnet/uhttp-lib repository:"
gh api repos/hoprnet/uhttp-lib/tags --paginate --jq '.[].name' || echo "Failed to fetch git tags."

Length of output: 572

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant