-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
uHTTP playground testing #45
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎
|
📝 WalkthroughWalkthroughThe changes consist of updates to three files: Changes
📜 Recent review detailsConfiguration used: CodeRabbit UI 📒 Files selected for processing (1)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 5
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (4)
.env.example (4)
1-1
: Consider adding a comment to explain the expected format of uClientId.While using "XXXX" as a placeholder is common, it would be helpful to provide more context about the expected format or length of the client ID. This can help users understand how to properly configure this variable.
Consider adding a comment like this:
-uClientId = XXXX +# uClientId: A unique identifier for the client (e.g., a UUID or a string of specific length) +uClientId = XXXX
2-2
: Add a comment explaining the purpose of uForceZeroHop.The purpose of this boolean flag is not immediately clear from its name. It would be beneficial to add a comment explaining what "zero hop" means in this context and the implications of setting this flag to true.
Consider adding a comment like this:
-uForceZeroHop = true +# uForceZeroHop: When set to true, forces the use of zero-hop mode (explain what this means and its implications) +uForceZeroHop = true
3-3
: Add a comment for discoveryPlatformEndpoint and consider environment-specific values.While the URL is clear, it would be helpful to add a comment explaining the purpose of this discovery platform endpoint. Additionally, consider providing alternative endpoints for different environments (e.g., development, staging, production).
Consider modifying the line like this:
-discoveryPlatformEndpoint = https://discovery-platform.hoprnet.link +# discoveryPlatformEndpoint: URL for the discovery platform service +# Production: https://discovery-platform.hoprnet.link +# Staging: https://staging-discovery-platform.hoprnet.link +# Development: http://localhost:3000 +discoveryPlatformEndpoint = https://discovery-platform.hoprnet.link
1-3
: Add a header comment and usage instructions to the .env.example file.To improve the usability of this example file, consider adding a header comment explaining its purpose and instructions on how to use it. This will help developers understand how to properly set up their environment.
Consider adding the following at the beginning of the file:
+# .env.example +# This file serves as a template for setting up environment variables for the application. +# To use: +# 1. Copy this file and rename it to .env +# 2. Replace the placeholder values with your actual configuration +# 3. Ensure the .env file is not committed to version control (it should be in .gitignore) + uClientId = XXXX uForceZeroHop = true discoveryPlatformEndpoint = https://discovery-platform.hoprnet.link
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
yarn.lock
is excluded by!**/yarn.lock
,!**/*.lock
📒 Files selected for processing (6)
- .env.example (1 hunks)
- package.json (3 hunks)
- scripts/post-build-uHTTP.js (1 hunks)
- scripts/post-build.js (0 hunks)
- scripts/prepare-build-hub.js (0 hunks)
- scripts/prepare-build-node.js (0 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (3)
- scripts/post-build.js
- scripts/prepare-build-hub.js
- scripts/prepare-build-node.js
🧰 Additional context used
🔇 Additional comments (2)
package.json (2)
51-52
: Document uHTTP integration and verify build processThe changes introduce uHTTP-related functionality, including new build steps and dependencies. This represents a significant change to the project's build process.
Please update the project documentation to reflect these changes, including:
- The purpose and usage of the new
build:uHTTP
script- Any new environment variables or configuration needed for uHTTP
- How these changes affect the development and deployment workflow
To verify the impact of these changes on the build process, please run the following script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the new build process and its output # Run the new build script npm run build:uHTTP # Check if the build was successful if [ $? -eq 0 ]; then echo "Build successful. Checking for expected output..." # Check for the existence of expected build artifacts if [ -d "dist" ]; then echo "dist directory exists." ls -l dist else echo "Error: dist directory not found." fi # Check for any uHTTP-specific files or modifications echo "Checking for uHTTP-specific files or modifications:" find dist -type f -name "*uHTTP*" else echo "Build failed. Please check the build output for errors." fiThis script will help ensure that the new build process works as expected and produces the necessary artifacts for uHTTP integration.
Also applies to: 82-82, 91-92
82-82
: Approve new dependency and clarify usage of othersThe addition of
@hoprnet/uhttp-lib
is justified as it's used in the new build scripts.Could you please clarify the intended usage of
cheerio
anddotenv
in this project? These dependencies are not used in thepackage.json
file directly, so it would be helpful to understand their purpose.To verify the usage of these new dependencies, you can run the following script:
This will help identify where these dependencies are being used in the project.
Also applies to: 91-92
✅ Verification successful
Dependencies Usage Confirmed
All added dependencies (
@hoprnet/uhttp-lib
,cheerio
, anddotenv
) are utilized withinscripts/post-build-uHTTP.js
.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for usage of new dependencies in the project echo "Searching for usage of @hoprnet/uhttp-lib:" rg --type js --type ts "@hoprnet/uhttp-lib" echo "\nSearching for usage of cheerio:" rg --type js --type ts "cheerio" echo "\nSearching for usage of dotenv:" rg --type js --type ts "dotenv"Length of output: 233
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for usage of new dependencies in the project echo "Searching for usage of @hoprnet/uhttp-lib:" rg --type js --type ts "@hoprnet/uhttp-lib" echo "\nSearching for usage of cheerio:" rg --type js --type ts "cheerio" echo "\nSearching for usage of dotenv:" rg --type js --type ts "dotenv"Length of output: 716
package.json
Outdated
"build": "tsc && vite build && node ./node_modules/@hoprnet/uhttp-lib/service-worker/post-build-uHTTP.js", | ||
"build:uHTTP": "tsc && vite build && node ./node_modules/@hoprnet/uhttp-lib/service-worker/post-build-uHTTP.js", |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Consider consolidating duplicate build scripts
The build
and build:uHTTP
scripts are identical. This duplication may lead to maintenance issues in the future.
Consider keeping only one of these scripts or differentiating them if they serve different purposes. If build:uHTTP
is intended for a specific use case, you could refactor it to use the build
script:
"build": "tsc && vite build && node ./node_modules/@hoprnet/uhttp-lib/service-worker/post-build-uHTTP.js",
"build:uHTTP": "npm run build"
This approach maintains the functionality while reducing duplication.
scripts/post-build-uHTTP.js
Outdated
|
||
$('head > script').remove(); | ||
$('head > link').remove(); | ||
$('').add(); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Remove unnecessary code: $('').add();
The line $('').add();
doesn't have any effect and can be safely removed.
Apply this diff:
- $('').add();
📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
$('').add(); |
scripts/post-build-uHTTP.js
Outdated
return output; | ||
}; | ||
|
||
function preparePersonalasiedStartingScript(elements) { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Correct the typo in function name
There's a typo in the function name preparePersonalasiedStartingScript
. It should be preparePersonalizedStartingScript
.
Apply this diff:
-function preparePersonalasiedStartingScript(elements) {
+function preparePersonalizedStartingScript(elements) {
📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
function preparePersonalasiedStartingScript(elements) { | |
function preparePersonalizedStartingScript(elements) { |
scripts/post-build-uHTTP.js
Outdated
const elements = getScriptsAndLinks(originalHTML); | ||
const newHTML = prepareNewIndexHTML(originalHTML); | ||
saveIndexHTML(newHTML); | ||
preparePersonalasiedStartingScript(elements); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Update function call to match corrected function name
After correcting the function name, ensure you update the function call accordingly.
Apply this diff:
- preparePersonalasiedStartingScript(elements);
+ preparePersonalizedStartingScript(elements);
📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
preparePersonalasiedStartingScript(elements); | |
preparePersonalizedStartingScript(elements); |
scripts/post-build-uHTTP.js
Outdated
elements.map((element, index) =>{ | ||
output = output + ` const s${index} = document.createElement("${element.tag}");\n` | ||
const attributes = element.attributes; | ||
const attributeNames = Object.keys(attributes); | ||
for(let i = 0; i < attributeNames.length; i++) { | ||
const key = attributeNames[i]; | ||
const value = attributes[key]; | ||
output = output + ` s${index}.${key} = "${value}";\n` | ||
} | ||
output = output + ` document.querySelector('head').append(s${index});\n` | ||
}) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Use forEach
instead of map
for side effects
You're using elements.map
without returning a new array. Since you're performing side effects, it's better to use elements.forEach
.
Apply this diff:
- elements.map((element, index) =>{
+ elements.forEach((element, index) =>{
📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
elements.map((element, index) =>{ | |
output = output + ` const s${index} = document.createElement("${element.tag}");\n` | |
const attributes = element.attributes; | |
const attributeNames = Object.keys(attributes); | |
for(let i = 0; i < attributeNames.length; i++) { | |
const key = attributeNames[i]; | |
const value = attributes[key]; | |
output = output + ` s${index}.${key} = "${value}";\n` | |
} | |
output = output + ` document.querySelector('head').append(s${index});\n` | |
}) | |
elements.forEach((element, index) =>{ | |
output = output + ` const s${index} = document.createElement("${element.tag}");\n` | |
const attributes = element.attributes; | |
const attributeNames = Object.keys(attributes); | |
for(let i = 0; i < attributeNames.length; i++) { | |
const key = attributeNames[i]; | |
const value = attributes[key]; | |
output = output + ` s${index}.${key} = "${value}";\n` | |
} | |
output = output + ` document.querySelector('head').append(s${index});\n` | |
}) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
public/manifest.json (1)
2-3
: LGTM! Consider adding adescription
field.The changes to
short_name
andname
are appropriate and align with the project's identity. Theshort_name
is now more specific to the project, and thename
provides a clear, branded title for the application.Consider adding a
description
field to provide more context about the application. For example:{ "short_name": "hub-hoprnet-org", "name": "HOPR | Staking Hub", "description": "Staking hub for the HOPR network", ... }This addition can improve the manifest's completeness and potentially aid in SEO and app store listings if applicable.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
yarn.lock
is excluded by!**/yarn.lock
,!**/*.lock
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
- package.json (3 hunks)
- public/manifest.json (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🔇 Additional comments (2)
package.json (2)
52-53
: 🛠️ Refactor suggestionRefactor duplicate build scripts
The
build
andbuild:uHTTP
scripts are identical, which may lead to maintenance issues in the future. This duplication was previously flagged in a past review.Consider refactoring these scripts to reduce duplication:
- "build": "tsc && vite build && uhttp-post-build-react", - "build:uHTTP": "tsc && vite build && uhttp-post-build-react", + "build": "tsc && vite build && uhttp-post-build-react", + "build:uHTTP": "npm run build"This approach maintains the functionality while reducing duplication and improving maintainability.
91-92
: Provide context for new dev dependenciesTwo new development dependencies have been added:
cheerio
(^1.0.0)dotenv
(^16.4.5)Could you please provide more context on how these new dependencies are being used in the project? This information will help in understanding the purpose of these additions and ensure they are necessary for the development process.
To help understand the usage of these new dependencies, please run the following script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for usage of new dependencies in the project echo "Searching for cheerio usage:" rg --type js --type ts 'require\(["\']cheerio["\']\)|import.*from.*["\']cheerio["\']\|cheerio\.' -A 5 echo "Searching for dotenv usage:" rg --type js --type ts 'require\(["\']dotenv["\']\)|import.*from.*["\']dotenv["\']\|dotenv\.' -A 5
package.json
Outdated
@@ -7,6 +7,7 @@ | |||
"@emotion/styled": "^11.11.0", | |||
"@fontsource/roboto": "^5.0.0", | |||
"@hoprnet/hopr-sdk": "2.1.0-beta.30", | |||
"@hoprnet/uhttp-lib": "3.8.0-beta.3", |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
💡 Codebase verification
Dependency version @hoprnet/uhttp-lib v3.8.0-beta.3 does not exist
The specified version v3.8.0-beta.3
for @hoprnet/uhttp-lib
does not exist in the repository's releases or tags. Please verify and update the dependency to a valid version.
🔗 Analysis chain
Verify the impact of the @hoprnet/uhttp-lib update
The @hoprnet/uhttp-lib
package has been updated from version 3.8.0-beta.2
to 3.8.0-beta.3
. While this is a minor version update, it's important to ensure that it doesn't introduce any breaking changes or unexpected behavior.
Please run the following script to check for any breaking changes or significant updates in the changelog:
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for breaking changes or significant updates in @hoprnet/uhttp-lib
# Fetch the changelog or release notes
changelog=$(gh api repos/hoprnet/uhttp-lib/releases/tags/v3.8.0-beta.3 --jq .body)
# Check for keywords indicating breaking changes or significant updates
if echo "$changelog" | grep -iE "breaking|major|significant|important|attention|warning"; then
echo "Potential breaking changes or significant updates found in @hoprnet/uhttp-lib v3.8.0-beta.3:"
echo "$changelog"
else
echo "No obvious breaking changes found in @hoprnet/uhttp-lib v3.8.0-beta.3"
fi
# Compare the API of the two versions
npm diff --diff=@hoprnet/[email protected] --diff=@hoprnet/[email protected]
Length of output: 244
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for breaking changes or significant updates in @hoprnet/uhttp-lib
# Fetch the changelog or release notes
changelog=$(gh api repos/hoprnet/uhttp-lib/releases/tags/v3.8.0-beta.3 --jq .body)
# Check for keywords indicating breaking changes or significant updates
if echo "$changelog" | grep -iE "breaking|major|significant|important|attention|warning"; then
echo "Potential breaking changes or significant updates found in @hoprnet/uhttp-lib v3.8.0-beta.3:"
echo "$changelog"
else
echo "No obvious breaking changes found in @hoprnet/uhttp-lib v3.8.0-beta.3"
fi
# Display differences between the two versions
gh api repos/hoprnet/uhttp-lib/compare/v3.8.0-beta.2...v3.8.0-beta.3 --jq '.files[] | {filename: .filename, status: .status}'
Length of output: 883
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: List all releases and tags for @hoprnet/uhttp-lib to verify the existence of v3.8.0-beta.3
# Fetch and list all release tags
echo "Fetching all release tags for @hoprnet/uhttp-lib:"
gh api repos/hoprnet/uhttp-lib/releases --per-page 100 --jq '.[].tag_name' || echo "Failed to fetch releases."
# Fetch and list all git tags
echo "Fetching all git tags for @hoprnet/uhttp-lib repository:"
gh api repos/hoprnet/uhttp-lib/tags --per-page 100 --jq '.[].name' || echo "Failed to fetch git tags."
Length of output: 3237
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: List all releases and tags for @hoprnet/uhttp-lib to verify the existence of v3.8.0-beta.3
# Fetch and list all release tags
echo "Fetching all release tags for @hoprnet/uhttp-lib:"
gh api repos/hoprnet/uhttp-lib/releases --paginate --jq '.[].tag_name' || echo "Failed to fetch releases."
# Fetch and list all git tags
echo "Fetching all git tags for @hoprnet/uhttp-lib repository:"
gh api repos/hoprnet/uhttp-lib/tags --paginate --jq '.[].name' || echo "Failed to fetch git tags."
Length of output: 572
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Dependencies
@hoprnet/uhttp-lib
to version4.0.0-beta.0
.cheerio
anddotenv
.Build Process