-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Rename to uhttp #11
Rename to uhttp #11
Conversation
WalkthroughWalkthroughThe project underwent a comprehensive renaming process, changing its name from Changes
Sequence Diagram(s) (Beta)The changes are primarily related to renaming and updating references and do not introduce new features or modify control flows significantly. Therefore, generating sequence diagrams is not applicable in this context. Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)
Additionally, you can add CodeRabbit Configration File (
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Outside diff range and nitpick comments (2)
src/index.ts (2)
Line range hint
204-267
: Consider refactoring this function expression into an arrow function for better readability and to align with modern JavaScript practices.- async function setup(ops: Ops): Promise<State> { + const setup = async (ops: Ops): Promise<State> => {
Line range hint
490-500
: Prefer usingfor...of
instead offorEach
for better performance, especially when dealing with large arrays.- segments.forEach((seg: Segment.Segment) => { + for (const seg of segments) {
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files ignored due to path filters (1)
yarn.lock
is excluded by!**/*.lock
Files selected for processing (7)
- .changeset/thin-otters-smoke.md (1 hunks)
- .github/workflows/node.js.yml (1 hunks)
- CHANGELOG.md (1 hunks)
- README.md (1 hunks)
- flake.nix (1 hunks)
- package.json (2 hunks)
- src/index.ts (2 hunks)
Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (5)
- .changeset/thin-otters-smoke.md
- CHANGELOG.md
- README.md
- flake.nix
- package.json
Additional context used
Biome
src/index.ts
[error] 204-267: This function expression can be turned into an arrow function. (lint/complexity/useArrowFunction)
Function expressions that don't use this can be turned into arrow functions.
Safe fix: Use an arrow function instead.
[error] 490-500: Prefer for...of instead of forEach. (lint/complexity/noForEach)
forEach may lead to performance issues when working with large arrays. When combined with functions like filter or map, this causes multiple iterations over the same type.
Additional comments not posted (3)
.github/workflows/node.js.yml (1)
79-79
: The Docker image path update aligns with the project renaming. Ensure that the new path is correctly configured in the Google Cloud Registry.src/index.ts (2)
14-14
: The import path update is correct and aligns with the new library name.
552-571
: The environment variable names have been updated to reflect the new project name. Ensure that these environment variables are correctly set in the deployment configuration.
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
@hoprnet/phttp-lib
to@hoprnet/uhttp-lib
).Chores
UHTTP
prefixes instead ofPHTTP
.