feat(agents/starknet): support routing ISM

[aroralanuk]

Description

• enable the already implemented domain_routing_ism in the relayer
• add routing ism over aggregation of message id and pausable ism to the e2e test
• dry_run_verify uses to_padded_bytes instead for compatibility with encoding in other parts of the starknet integration.

Drive-by changes

Related issues

• fixes https://github.com/hyperlane-xyz/issues/issues/1405

Backward compatibility

Yes

Testing

e2e

[changeset-bot]

⚠️ No Changeset found

Latest commit: ff3a8b6

Merging this PR will not cause a version bump for any packages. If these changes should not result in a new version, you're good to go. If these changes should result in a version bump, you need to add a changeset.

This PR includes no changesets

When changesets are added to this PR, you'll see the packages that this PR includes changesets for and the associated semver types

Click here to learn what changesets are, and how to add one.

Click here if you're a maintainer who wants to add a changeset to this PR

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 77.53%. Comparing base (2d4963c) to head (88ba5cf).
Report is 66 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main    #5153   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   77.53%   77.53%           
=======================================
  Files         103      103           
  Lines        2110     2110           
  Branches      190      190           
=======================================
  Hits         1636     1636           
  Misses        453      453           
  Partials       21       21           

Components	Coverage Δ
core	87.80% <ø> (ø)
hooks	79.39% <ø> (ø)
isms	83.68% <ø> (ø)
token	91.27% <ø> (ø)
middlewares	79.80% <ø> (ø)

[tkporter]

lgtm, seems like we'll def need a deeper review of the starknet feature branch though

[tkporter]

I see that elsewhere they were unwrapping but can you pls not unwrap? and if it's easy, change the other places where they do this. If it seems like it'll take a while you can punt on changing it elsewhere as I assume we'll need to do a big review of things before considering this fully done

Would recommend .ok_or_else(|| eyre!("error message here") or something