Skip to content

Commit

Permalink
Update ietf-rats-charter.md
Browse files Browse the repository at this point in the history
  • Loading branch information
thomas-fossati authored Feb 11, 2022
1 parent 42a06c0 commit 16a3b8c
Showing 1 changed file with 2 additions and 5 deletions.
7 changes: 2 additions & 5 deletions ietf-rats-charter.md
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -15,7 +15,7 @@ party may require evidence about:
* system component identity,
* composition of system components, including nested components,
* roots of trust,
* assertion/claim origination or provenance,
* an assertion/claim origination or provenance,
* manufacturing origin,
* system component integrity,
* system component configuration,
Expand All @@ -39,7 +39,7 @@ to a verifier and these attestation results to a relying party.
Additionally, the WG will standardize formats for endorsements and reference values,
and may apply and/or profile existing protocols (e.g. DTLS, CoAP, or MUD) to convey them
to the verifier. Formats and protocols for appraisal policy for evidence and appraisal
policy for attestation results are also out of scope.
policy for attestation results are out of scope.

The WG will continue to cooperate and coordinate with other IETF WGs such as
TEEP and SUIT, and work with organizations in the community, such as the TCG,
Expand All @@ -56,9 +56,6 @@ follows:
consensus but not expected to be published as an RFC).

2. Specify terminology and architecture that enable attestation techniques.
The architecture may include a system security model for the signing key
material and involve at least the system component, system component provider,
and the relying authority.

3. Standardize an information model for evidence and attestations results scoped by the
specified use-cases.
Expand Down

0 comments on commit 16a3b8c

Please sign in to comment.