-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 8
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Document RR and PAF affected measures, current NO fix #1592
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
@@ -287,9 +287,326 @@ Ratio measures and difference measures tell us very different things. Ratio meas | |||
|
|||
Difference measures relating to the whole population tend to be more useful and thus more widely used. These population difference measures, also called measures of impact. It is important to realise that ratios and differences can result in very different interpretations. For example, if an association between a risk factor and disease outcome is very strong in a particular group (high relative risks), but the outcome is relatively uncommon in this group, a big increase in risk will result in a modest increase in cases. Alternatively, if the outcome is common among a group, a small relative risk can lead to a large increase in cases. Ratio measures are most useful for determining which risk factors are most strongly associated with disease, whereas difference measures are more useful for estimating the public health importance of different risk factors. | |||
|
|||
.. _measures_of_impact: | |||
|
|||
Measures of impact |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Mostly moved from PAF page; moved because it is about epi studies and not simulations specifically
@@ -14,7 +14,7 @@ A risk effect is a measure of how some variable (the risk factor) causally impac | |||
some outcome variable. | |||
|
|||
Generally, we will use risk effects models to represent | |||
associations between two variables that are assumed to be causal and | |||
a causal effect of one variable on another and |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This could probably use a broader sweep through other pages, but I figured I might as well start with this one. Our risk effects have explicitly causal interpretations and we need to state that clearly throughout IMO
@@ -272,41 +275,113 @@ Where, | |||
|
|||
We can refer to the outcome rate multiplied by (1 - PAF) as the "risk-deleted outcome rate." | |||
|
|||
.. todo:: | |||
Using RRs and PAFs from GBD |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This is the new content.
Make this precise. | ||
I believe that this is heuristic and not quite correct. | ||
The :ref:`child growth failure risk effects page <2021_risk_effect_cgf>` includes a notebook that approximately checks it | ||
numerically, and a Word document that concludes with an "almost identical" | ||
equation that seems importantly different. | ||
Also, the Word doc appears to be about a risk factor that affects mortality, | ||
rather than a risk factor that affects a disease that affects mortality? | ||
So I think something has been lost here. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Should probably make a ticket for this?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thank you for capturing all of this!
No description provided.