-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 232
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Make the Debugger a singleton and do not reset the stopframe to None during postmortem. #667
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Changes from 2 commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
|
@@ -183,15 +183,24 @@ | |
|
||
# {{{ debugger interface | ||
|
||
class Debugger(bdb.Bdb): | ||
class Singleton(type): | ||
_instance = None | ||
|
||
def __call__(cls, *args, **kwargs): | ||
if not cls._instance: | ||
cls._instance = super(Singleton, cls).__call__(*args, **kwargs) | ||
else: | ||
cls._pytest_postmortem = True | ||
return cls._instance | ||
|
||
|
||
class Debugger(bdb.Bdb, metaclass=Singleton): | ||
_current_debugger = [] | ||
_pytest_postmortem = False | ||
|
||
def __init__(self, stdin=None, stdout=None, term_size=None, steal_output=False, | ||
_continue_at_start=False, tty_file=None, **kwargs): | ||
|
||
if Debugger._current_debugger: | ||
raise ValueError("a Debugger instance already exists") | ||
|
||
# Pass remaining kwargs to python debugger framework | ||
bdb.Bdb.__init__(self, **kwargs) | ||
self.ui = DebuggerUI(self, stdin=stdin, stdout=stdout, term_size=term_size) | ||
|
@@ -214,6 +223,32 @@ def __init__(self, stdin=None, stdout=None, term_size=None, steal_output=False, | |
# Okay, now we have a debugger | ||
self._current_debugger.append(self) | ||
Comment on lines
228
to
229
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Could we get rid of There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. That is logic in place for Trying to instantiate a debugger again (and thus previously hitting the ValueError) is what pytest is doing. Thus my code only works around that specific pytest problem. All logic around There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Why? There are now essentially two copies of singleton-management code floating around. My question is aimed at reducing that to one. |
||
|
||
def reset(self): | ||
"""Set values of attributes as ready to start debugging. | ||
|
||
Override from Bdb.reset() | ||
|
||
When pytest starts a postmortem analysis, but the debugger is already active, | ||
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
What does "active" mean in this context? How is this circumstance detected? |
||
calling .reset() in src/_pytest/debugging.py::post_mortem | ||
hwalinga marked this conversation as resolved.
Show resolved
Hide resolved
|
||
causes the self.stopframe to be set to None. | ||
This pauses the debugger somewhere in the source code of the debugger. See #67 | ||
|
||
We detect using _pytest_postmortem that this is the case and do not set the | ||
stopframe to None then. | ||
|
||
Related #607, #52 | ||
""" | ||
import linecache | ||
linecache.checkcache() | ||
self.botframe = None | ||
if not self._pytest_postmortem: | ||
self.stopframe = None | ||
else: | ||
self._pytest_postmortem = False | ||
self.returnframe = None | ||
self.quitting = False | ||
self.stoplineno = 0 | ||
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Would it be possible to call into There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. When calling Bdb.reset the debugger stops around there. Do you think there needs to be more information in the docstring of this method to explain why it needs to be overriden? |
||
|
||
def __del__(self): | ||
# according to https://stackoverflow.com/a/1481512/1054322, the garbage | ||
# collector cannot be relied on to call this, so we call it explicitly | ||
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
How can we be sure that this case is only hit by pytest, as the code suggests? Could the condition under which this triggers be made a bit more narrow?