Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[CI] Add Trivy workflow #16840

Merged
merged 6 commits into from
Feb 4, 2025
Merged
Show file tree
Hide file tree
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension


Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
37 changes: 37 additions & 0 deletions .github/workflows/trivy.yml
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
@@ -0,0 +1,37 @@
# This workflow performs a trivy check of docker config files.

name: Trivy

on:
pull_request:
paths:
- 'devops/containers/**'
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@aelovikov-intel might have an opinon here :P

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think we should add the files from this PR too.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@aelovikov-intel could you please clarify what do you mean? Just trigger on every PR?

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Changes to this workflow and this trivy configuration should trigger CI.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks, got it 28a701e

- 'devops/.trivyignore.yaml'
- '.github/workflows/trivy.yml'
workflow_dispatch:

jobs:
build:
name: Trivy
runs-on: ubuntu-latest
steps:
- name: Checkout code
uses: actions/checkout@v4
with:
sparse-checkout: devops

# There is a github action, but for some reason it ignores ignore-file.
- name: Install Trivy
run: |
curl -sfL https://raw.githubusercontent.com/aquasecurity/trivy/main/contrib/install.sh | sh
./bin/trivy --version

- name: Run Trivy vulnerability scanner
run: ./bin/trivy config --format json --output trivy-report.json --ignorefile=devops/.trivyignore.yaml devops/containers --exit-code 1

- name: Upload report artifact
uses: actions/upload-artifact@v4
with:
name: trivy-report
path: trivy-report.json
retention-days: 3
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

is 3 days enough?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Since this check takes like ~10s, I think 3 days is even too much :) you can just re-run it if needed. Anyway, what it should be in your opinion?

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

i guess it depends on how do we expect the results to be used? is it just checking it when the workflow fails and not really after that? if so this is fine

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

i guess it depends on how do we expect the results to be used? is it just checking it when the workflow fails and not really after that? if so this is fine

The main use case is to upload them as an evidence of the scan.

@KornevNikita, is it correct to assume that any new issue will fail this workflow? If so, then 3 days is more than enough to grab results which are expected to be always good.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

It's good that Nick asked, turned out we need to set "exit-code" arg to get a non-zero result in case of fail - updated 0fdba39

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

😎

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I bet he found it out a day or two ago when hunting zombies :D

5 changes: 5 additions & 0 deletions devops/.trivyignore.yaml
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
@@ -0,0 +1,5 @@
misconfigurations:
- id: AVD-DS-0001
KornevNikita marked this conversation as resolved.
Show resolved Hide resolved
statement: "We use our own containers, no uncontrolled behavior is expected when the image is updated"
- id: AVD-DS-0026
statement: "Our containers do not provide running services, but only preinstalled tools, there is not much value in adding HEALTHCHECK directives"
Loading