-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 43
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
feat: updated validation script to check partial bin sums #171
feat: updated validation script to check partial bin sums #171
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
thanks @ekauffma , I would have approved the PR but I don't have enough permission to do so, I can only comment 😄
I could not completely follow the logic in my head, so sorry if some of the comments don't make sense. Even with the comments, that you can feel free to disregard, this overall LGTM.
@eguiraud I made a lot of edits inspired by your suggestions. I would appreciate if you would read again and let me know if you find it easier to follow now! Thank you |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Looks great!! Took me less than 10 minutes to go through. What I didn't understand yesterday was "(to form groupings of bins based on location)" 😬 😅
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Looks good to me, thanks for adding this!
* updated validation script to check partial bin sums * added verbose flag
This is an attempt to address #168 . If adjacent bins are similar enough, the partial sum of the affected bins is compared. This will ensure that one event migrating across bins will not flag as an error. Maybe we can test this with RDF implementation (@andriiknu)
@alexander-held @eguiraud