forked from bevyengine/bevy
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1
Commit
This commit does not belong to any branch on this repository, and may belong to a fork outside of the repository.
bevy_reflect: Function reflection terminology refactor (bevyengine#14813
) # Objective One of the changes in bevyengine#14704 made `DynamicFunction` effectively the same as `DynamicClosure<'static>`. This change meant that the de facto function type would likely be `DynamicClosure<'static>` instead of the intended `DynamicFunction`, since the former is much more flexible. We _could_ explore ways of making `DynamicFunction` implement `Copy` using some unsafe code, but it likely wouldn't be worth it. And users would likely still reach for the convenience of `DynamicClosure<'static>` over the copy-ability of `DynamicFunction`. The goal of this PR is to fix this confusion between the two types. ## Solution Firstly, the `DynamicFunction` type was removed. Again, it was no different than `DynamicClosure<'static>` so it wasn't a huge deal to remove. Secondly, `DynamicClosure<'env>` and `DynamicClosureMut<'env>` were renamed to `DynamicFunction<'env>` and `DynamicFunctionMut<'env>`, respectively. Yes, we still ultimately kept the naming of `DynamicFunction`, but changed its behavior to that of `DynamicClosure<'env>`. We need a term to refer to both functions and closures, and "function" was the best option. [Originally](https://discord.com/channels/691052431525675048/1002362493634629796/1274091992162242710), I was going to go with "callable" as the replacement term to encompass both functions and closures (e.g. `DynamciCallable<'env>`). However, it was [suggested](https://discord.com/channels/691052431525675048/1002362493634629796/1274653581777047625) by @SkiFire13 that the simpler "function" term could be used instead. While "callable" is perhaps the better umbrella term—being truly ambiguous over functions and closures— "function" is more familiar, used more often, easier to discover, and is subjectively just "better-sounding". ## Testing Most changes are purely swapping type names or updating documentation, but you can verify everything still works by running the following command: ``` cargo test --package bevy_reflect ```
- Loading branch information
Showing
29 changed files
with
772 additions
and
1,239 deletions.
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
11 changes: 5 additions & 6 deletions
11
crates/bevy_reflect/compile_fail/tests/into_function/closure_fail.rs
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
@@ -1,19 +1,18 @@ | ||
#![allow(unused)] | ||
|
||
use bevy_reflect::func::IntoFunction; | ||
use bevy_reflect::func::{DynamicFunction, IntoFunction}; | ||
use bevy_reflect::Reflect; | ||
|
||
fn main() { | ||
let value = String::from("Hello, World!"); | ||
let closure_capture_owned = move || println!("{}", value); | ||
|
||
let _ = closure_capture_owned.into_function(); | ||
//~^ E0277 | ||
// Pass: | ||
let _: DynamicFunction<'static> = closure_capture_owned.into_function(); | ||
|
||
let value = String::from("Hello, World!"); | ||
let closure_capture_reference = || println!("{}", value); | ||
//~^ ERROR: `value` does not live long enough | ||
|
||
let _ = closure_capture_reference.into_function(); | ||
// ↑ This should be an error (E0277) but `compile_fail_utils` fails to pick it up | ||
// when the `closure_capture_owned` test is present | ||
let _: DynamicFunction<'static> = closure_capture_reference.into_function(); | ||
} |
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.