Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update Readme with Case Study Project that implemented appJar GUI #169

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: appJar
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

ltfschoen
Copy link

I am a contributor to content-downloader repository. I found the appJar extremely simple to use and it enhanced the quality of the user experience significantly since users can now visualise the capabilities of the product in a simple appJar GUI control panel instead of only being able to run it with a CLI using commands and flags

I am a contributor to content-downloader repository. I found the appJar extremely simple to use and it enhanced the quality of the user experience significantly since users can now visualise the capabilities of the product in a simple appJar GUI control panel instead of only being able to run it with a CLI using commands and flags
@coveralls
Copy link

coveralls commented May 28, 2017

Coverage Status

Coverage increased (+0.01%) to 70.222% when pulling be453dd on ltfschoen:patch-2 into ddfce14 on jarvisteach:appJar.

1 similar comment
@coveralls
Copy link

Coverage Status

Coverage increased (+0.01%) to 70.222% when pulling be453dd on ltfschoen:patch-2 into ddfce14 on jarvisteach:appJar.

@jarvisteach
Copy link
Owner

Hi @ltfschoen I'm really pleased you're using appJar for your GUI, and impressed you've used so many features! You might find the theming works better in the new release...

I'm not quite sure I'm ready to start linking to example apps, but I do like the idea.

I'm going to leave this on the back-burner for now, but might add it in a bit further down the line.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants