Fixing the output plots of the two-hierarchical parameter model

kaybenleroll · Aug 25, 2023 · 71d9965 · 71d9965
1 parent da67397
commit 71d9965
Show file tree

Hide file tree

Showing 11 changed files with 3,741 additions and 1,286 deletions.
diff --git a/Dockerfile b/Dockerfile
@@ -1,4 +1,11 @@
-FROM rocker/tidyverse:4.2.3
+FROM rocker/tidyverse:4.3.0
+
+ARG BUILD_DATE
+
+LABEL org.opencontainers.image.source="https://github.com/kaybenleroll/btydbayes_investigation" \
+      org.opencontainers.image.authors="Mick Cooney <[email protected]>" \
+      org.label-schema.build-date=$BUILD_DATE
+
 
 ENV TZ=Europe/Dublin
 

diff --git a/Makefile b/Makefile
@@ -89,10 +89,12 @@ clean-models:
 
 ### Docker targets
 docker-build-image: Dockerfile
-	docker build -t ${IMAGE_TAG} -f Dockerfile .
+	docker build -t ${IMAGE_TAG} \
+	  --build-arg BUILD_DATE=$(shell date -u +'%Y-%m-%dT%H:%M:%SZ') \
+	  -f Dockerfile .
 
 docker-show-context:
-	docker build -f context.dockerfile -t context-image .
+	docker build -f build/context.dockerfile -t context-image .
 	docker run --rm -it context-image find /tmp/build
 	docker rmi test:latest
 

diff --git a/context.dockerfile → build/context.dockerfile b/context.dockerfile → build/context.dockerfile
diff --git a/construct_cdnow_twohier_pnbd_models.html b/construct_cdnow_twohier_pnbd_models.html
diff --git a/construct_cdnow_twohier_pnbd_models.qmd b/construct_cdnow_twohier_pnbd_models.qmd
@@ -304,8 +304,7 @@ We also check $N_{eff}$ as a quick diagnostic of the fit.
 #| echo: TRUE
 
 pnbd_cdnow_twohiermean_stanfit |>
-  neff_ratio(pars = c("lambda", "mu")) |>
-  as.numeric() |>
+  neff_ratio(pars = c("lambda_mn", "mu_mn", "lambda", "mu")) |>
   mcmc_neff() +
     ggtitle("Plot of Parameter Effective Sample Sizes")
 ```

diff --git a/construct_longsynth_twohier_pnbd_models.html b/construct_longsynth_twohier_pnbd_models.html
diff --git a/construct_longsynth_twohier_pnbd_models.qmd b/construct_longsynth_twohier_pnbd_models.qmd
@@ -290,8 +290,7 @@ We also check $N_{eff}$ as a quick diagnostic of the fit.
 #| echo: TRUE
 
 pnbd_long_twohiermean_stanfit |>
-  neff_ratio(pars = c("lambda", "mu")) |>
-  as.numeric() |>
+  neff_ratio(pars = c("lambda_mn", "mu_mn", "lambda", "mu")) |>
   mcmc_neff() +
     ggtitle("Plot of Parameter Effective Sample Sizes")
 ```

diff --git a/construct_onlineretail_twohier_pnbd_models.html b/construct_onlineretail_twohier_pnbd_models.html
diff --git a/construct_onlineretail_twohier_pnbd_models.qmd b/construct_onlineretail_twohier_pnbd_models.qmd
@@ -285,7 +285,6 @@ We also check $N_{eff}$ as a quick diagnostic of the fit.
 
 pnbd_onlineretail_twohiermean_stanfit |>
   neff_ratio(pars = c("lambda_mn", "mu_mn", "lambda", "mu")) |>
-  as.numeric() |>
   mcmc_neff() +
     ggtitle("Plot of Parameter Effective Sample Sizes")
 ```
@@ -573,8 +572,6 @@ As for our short time frame data, overall our model is working well.
 
 
 
-
-
 # Compare Model Outputs
 
 We have looked at each of the models individually, but it is also worth looking

diff --git a/construct_shortsynth_twohier_pnbd_models.html b/construct_shortsynth_twohier_pnbd_models.html
diff --git a/construct_shortsynth_twohier_pnbd_models.qmd b/construct_shortsynth_twohier_pnbd_models.qmd
@@ -288,8 +288,7 @@ We also check $N_{eff}$ as a quick diagnostic of the fit.
 #| echo: TRUE
 
 pnbd_init_short_twohiermean_stanfit |>
-  neff_ratio(pars = c("lambda", "mu")) |>
-  as.numeric() |>
+  neff_ratio(pars = c("lambda_mn", "mu_mn", "lambda", "mu")) |>
   mcmc_neff() +
     ggtitle("Plot of Parameter Effective Sample Sizes")
 ```