Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

chore(deps): update docker/metadata-action action to v5 #8

Open
wants to merge 2 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

renovate-bot
Copy link
Contributor

@renovate-bot renovate-bot commented Oct 3, 2024

This PR contains the following updates:

Package Type Update Change
docker/metadata-action action major v3 -> v5

Release Notes

docker/metadata-action (docker/metadata-action)

v5

Compare Source

v4

Compare Source


Configuration

📅 Schedule: Branch creation - At any time (no schedule defined), Automerge - At any time (no schedule defined).

🚦 Automerge: Disabled by config. Please merge this manually once you are satisfied.

Rebasing: Whenever PR becomes conflicted, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

🔕 Ignore: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about this update again.


  • If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

This PR was generated by Mend Renovate. View the repository job log.

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Chores
    • Updated the Docker metadata action to version 5 for improved metadata handling during image builds.
    • Maintained existing workflow structure for building and publishing multi-platform Docker images.

Copy link

sourcery-ai bot commented Oct 3, 2024

Reviewer's Guide by Sourcery

This pull request updates the docker/metadata-action from version 3 to version 5 in the GitHub Actions workflow file. The change is straightforward, involving a single line modification in the workflow configuration.

No diagrams generated as the changes look simple and do not need a visual representation.

File-Level Changes

Change Details Files
Update docker/metadata-action to v5
  • Changed the version of docker/metadata-action from v3 to v5
  • Skipped version 4 and directly updated to version 5
.github/workflows/publish-docker.yml

Tips and commands

Interacting with Sourcery

  • Trigger a new review: Comment @sourcery-ai review on the pull request.
  • Continue discussions: Reply directly to Sourcery's review comments.
  • Generate a GitHub issue from a review comment: Ask Sourcery to create an
    issue from a review comment by replying to it.

Customizing Your Experience

Access your dashboard to:

  • Enable or disable review features such as the Sourcery-generated pull request
    summary, the reviewer's guide, and others.
  • Change the review language.
  • Add, remove or edit custom review instructions.
  • Adjust other review settings.

Getting Help

Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Oct 3, 2024

Walkthrough

The changes involve updates to the GitHub Actions workflow file for building and publishing a multi-platform Docker image. The version of the docker/metadata-action has been upgraded from v3 to v5, while the docker/build-push-action remains at v4. Commented-out sections related to Dockerfile validation and Docker Hub description settings are retained but inactive. The overall workflow structure, including jobs for repository checkout, QEMU and Docker Buildx setup, DockerHub and GitHub Container Registry login, registry status checks, and the image build and push process, remains unchanged.

Changes

File Change Summary
.github/workflows/publish-docker.yml Updated docker/metadata-action from v3 to v5; docker/build-push-action remains v4. Retained inactive commented-out sections for Dockerfile validation and Hub description.

Possibly related PRs

Poem

In the land of code where rabbits play,
Docker images build without delay.
With actions updated, we hop with glee,
Multi-platform dreams, as bright as can be!
So let’s raise our paws for the changes made,
In the garden of workflows, new paths are laid! 🐇✨


📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 019a3fe and 7eff56d.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • .github/workflows/publish-docker.yml (1 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
  • .github/workflows/publish-docker.yml

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

@sourcery-ai sourcery-ai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

We have skipped reviewing this pull request. It seems to have been created by a bot (hey, renovate-bot!). We assume it knows what it's doing!

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
.github/workflows/publish-docker.yml (1)

Line range hint 1-85: Consider reviewing commented-out sections

While reviewing the file, I noticed some commented-out sections that might be worth revisiting:

  1. The Dockerfile validation step (lines 25-28)
  2. The Docker Hub description update step (lines 80-86)

These sections might provide additional value to your workflow if implemented. Consider if these steps would be beneficial to include in your current process.

Would you like assistance in evaluating or implementing these commented-out sections?

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 61e9df0 and 019a3fe.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • .github/workflows/publish-docker.yml (1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
.github/workflows/publish-docker.yml (1)

35-35: Approve the update to docker/metadata-action@v5

Updating to the latest version is a good practice for security and feature improvements. However, since this is a major version update from v3 to v5, it's important to be aware of potential breaking changes or new features.

To ensure a smooth transition, please:

  1. Review the changelog for docker/metadata-action v4 and v5 for any breaking changes or deprecations.
  2. Verify that the outputs used in subsequent steps (like ${{ steps.meta.outputs.tags }} and ${{ steps.meta.outputs.labels }}) are still compatible with v5.
  3. Check if any new features introduced in v5 could be beneficial to this workflow.

You can use the following script to fetch the release notes:

This will help you review the changes and ensure the update doesn't introduce any issues.

✅ Verification successful

Approve the update to docker/metadata-action@v5

The release notes for v4.6.0 and v5.5.1 do not indicate any breaking changes that would affect the current workflow. Updating to the latest version should maintain compatibility and provide the latest features and security updates.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Fetch release notes for v4 and v5
gh release view v4 -R docker/metadata-action
echo "------------------------"
gh release view v5 -R docker/metadata-action

Length of output: 186


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# List all releases for docker/metadata-action to identify correct version tags
gh release list -R docker/metadata-action

Length of output: 1129


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Fetch release notes for the latest v4 and v5 releases
gh release view v4.6.0 -R docker/metadata-action
echo "------------------------"
gh release view v5.5.1 -R docker/metadata-action

Length of output: 1065

@renovate-bot renovate-bot changed the title Update docker/metadata-action action to v5 chore(deps): update docker/metadata-action action to v5 Oct 6, 2024
Copy link

Edited/Blocked Notification

Renovate will not automatically rebase this PR, because it does not recognize the last commit author and assumes somebody else may have edited the PR.

You can manually request rebase by checking the rebase/retry box above.

⚠️ Warning: custom changes will be lost.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants