Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update sigstore/cosign-installer action to v3.7.0 #5

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

renovate-bot
Copy link

@renovate-bot renovate-bot commented Nov 28, 2024

This PR contains the following updates:

Package Type Update Change
sigstore/cosign-installer action minor v3.5.0 -> v3.7.0

Release Notes

sigstore/cosign-installer (sigstore/cosign-installer)

v3.7.0

Compare Source

What's Changed

Full Changelog: sigstore/cosign-installer@v3.6.0...v3.7.0

v3.6.0

Compare Source

What's Changed

Full Changelog: sigstore/cosign-installer@v3...v3.6.0


Configuration

📅 Schedule: Branch creation - At any time (no schedule defined), Automerge - At any time (no schedule defined).

🚦 Automerge: Disabled by config. Please merge this manually once you are satisfied.

Rebasing: Whenever PR becomes conflicted, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

🔕 Ignore: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about this update again.


  • If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

This PR was generated by Mend Renovate. View the repository job log.

Copy link

sourcery-ai bot commented Nov 28, 2024

Reviewer's Guide by Sourcery

This PR updates the sigstore/cosign-installer GitHub Action from v3.5.0 to v3.7.0 in the Docker publish workflow. The update includes the latest cosign v2.4.1 release and various dependency updates in the installer action itself.

No diagrams generated as the changes look simple and do not need a visual representation.

File-Level Changes

Change Details Files
Update GitHub Action version reference
  • Update sigstore/cosign-installer action version from v3.5.0 to v3.7.0
  • Update commit hash reference to point to the latest release
.github/workflows/docker-publish.yml

Tips and commands

Interacting with Sourcery

  • Trigger a new review: Comment @sourcery-ai review on the pull request.
  • Continue discussions: Reply directly to Sourcery's review comments.
  • Generate a GitHub issue from a review comment: Ask Sourcery to create an
    issue from a review comment by replying to it.
  • Generate a pull request title: Write @sourcery-ai anywhere in the pull
    request title to generate a title at any time.
  • Generate a pull request summary: Write @sourcery-ai summary anywhere in
    the pull request body to generate a PR summary at any time. You can also use
    this command to specify where the summary should be inserted.

Customizing Your Experience

Access your dashboard to:

  • Enable or disable review features such as the Sourcery-generated pull request
    summary, the reviewer's guide, and others.
  • Change the review language.
  • Add, remove or edit custom review instructions.
  • Adjust other review settings.

Getting Help

Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Nov 28, 2024

Walkthrough

The pull request updates the Docker publishing workflow configuration in the GitHub Actions setup. It specifically replaces the version of the cosign-installer action from v3.5.0 to v3.7.0. This change is applied to the step responsible for installing the cosign tool, which is set to execute only when the event is not a pull request. No other modifications to the workflow's structure or logic have been made.

Changes

File Change Summary
.github/workflows/docker-publish.yml Updated cosign-installer action version from v3.5.0 to v3.7.0.

Poem

In the land of code where rabbits hop,
A version change made our workflow pop!
With cosign's new tune, we dance and play,
Publishing Docker in a snappy way!
Hops of joy, let the builds align,
For every change, our code will shine! 🐇✨


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 2

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
.github/workflows/docker-publish.yml (1)

Line range hint 1-93: Consider security enhancements for the workflow

While reviewing the workflow, I noticed some security-related suggestions:

  1. The workflow has appropriate permission scoping, which is good security practice.
  2. The workflow correctly uses commit SHA pins for all GitHub Actions, which prevents supply chain attacks.
  3. The signing step correctly uses an intermediate environment variable for security hardening.

However, consider these additional security enhancements:

  1. Add SLSA provenance generation for better supply chain security
  2. Enable cosign's keyless signing verification in your consumers

Would you like me to provide example configurations for these security enhancements?

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 3e43149 and f4e9c01.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • .github/workflows/docker-publish.yml (1 hunks)

Comment on lines 45 to 46
with:
cosign-release: 'v2.2.4'
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Update cosign-release to v2.4.1

The workflow is using cosign v2.2.4, but the PR objectives mention that v3.7.0 of the installer supports cosign v2.4.1. Consider updating to the latest supported version.

  with:
-   cosign-release: 'v2.2.4'
+   cosign-release: 'v2.4.1'
📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change
with:
cosign-release: 'v2.2.4'
with:
cosign-release: 'v2.4.1'

@@ -41,7 +41,7 @@ jobs:
# https://github.com/sigstore/cosign-installer
- name: Install cosign
if: github.event_name != 'pull_request'
uses: sigstore/cosign-installer@59acb6260d9c0ba8f4a2f9d9b48431a222b68e20 #v3.5.0
uses: sigstore/cosign-installer@dc72c7d5c4d10cd6bcb8cf6e3fd625a9e5e537da # v3.7.0
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Codebase verification

Incorrect commit hash and outdated cosign-release version

The workflow file has two issues that need attention:

  • The commit hash dc72c7d5c4d10cd6bcb8cf6e3fd625a9e5e537da does not match the official v3.7.0 tag (1aa8e0f2454b781fbf0fbf306a4c9533a0c57409)
  • The cosign-release is pinned to v2.2.4 while the PR objectives mention updating to v2.4.1

Please update:

  • Use the correct commit hash for v3.7.0: 1aa8e0f2454b781fbf0fbf306a4c9533a0c57409
  • Update the cosign-release input to v2.4.1
🔗 Analysis chain

LGTM! Verified cosign-installer version.

The commit hash dc72c7d5c4d10cd6bcb8cf6e3fd625a9e5e537da correctly corresponds to v3.7.0 of the cosign-installer action.


The initial verification shows a mismatch between the commit hash in the workflow and the one from the GitHub API. Let's gather more context about cosign usage in the workflows to provide a comprehensive response.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Verify the commit hash matches the v3.7.0 tag
gh api repos/sigstore/cosign-installer/git/refs/tags/v3.7.0 --jq .object.sha

Length of output: 119


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Let's verify the actual commit hash used in the workflow
rg "cosign-installer@" -A 2

# Also check if there are any other cosign-related actions in use
rg "cosign" .github/workflows/

Length of output: 803

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant