Skip to content

RHPAM-4779: SLA due date value in ProcessInstanceLog table is not upd… #180

RHPAM-4779: SLA due date value in ProcessInstanceLog table is not upd…

RHPAM-4779: SLA due date value in ProcessInstanceLog table is not upd… #180

Triggered via pull request August 5, 2024 11:16
@fjtiradofjtirado
closed #2396
Status Success
Total duration 37s
Artifacts

pr-backporting.yml

on: pull_request_target
compute-targets
2s
compute-targets
Matrix: backporting
Fit to window
Zoom out
Zoom in

Annotations

6 warnings
[7.67.x-blue] - Backporting
The following actions uses Node.js version which is deprecated and will be forced to run on node20: actions/checkout@v3, kiegroup/[email protected]. For more info: https://github.blog/changelog/2024-03-07-github-actions-all-actions-will-run-on-node20-instead-of-node16-by-default/
[7.67.x-blue] - Backporting
Input 'additional-reviewers' has been deprecated with message: [IGNORED] The previous default is managed by `include-requested-reviewers`. If you want to add more custom reviewers use `custom-reviewers` input instead
[7.67.x-blue] - Backporting
Input 'additional-reviewers' has been deprecated with message: [IGNORED] The previous default is managed by `include-requested-reviewers`. If you want to add more custom reviewers use `custom-reviewers` input instead
[7.67.x] - Backporting
The following actions uses Node.js version which is deprecated and will be forced to run on node20: actions/checkout@v3, kiegroup/[email protected]. For more info: https://github.blog/changelog/2024-03-07-github-actions-all-actions-will-run-on-node20-instead-of-node16-by-default/
[7.67.x] - Backporting
Input 'additional-reviewers' has been deprecated with message: [IGNORED] The previous default is managed by `include-requested-reviewers`. If you want to add more custom reviewers use `custom-reviewers` input instead
[7.67.x] - Backporting
Input 'additional-reviewers' has been deprecated with message: [IGNORED] The previous default is managed by `include-requested-reviewers`. If you want to add more custom reviewers use `custom-reviewers` input instead