Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fixed export #25

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Nov 16, 2024
Merged

Fixed export #25

merged 1 commit into from
Nov 16, 2024

Conversation

evgenyk
Copy link
Member

@evgenyk evgenyk commented Nov 16, 2024

Fixed export

Checklist

🛟 If you need help, consider asking for advice over in the Kinde community.

Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Nov 16, 2024

Walkthrough

The pull request introduces renaming changes to types and constants in the projectBundler and workflowBundler packages. In projectBundler.go, the type projectSettings is renamed to ProjectSettings, and the constant ProjectSettingsContextKey is updated accordingly. In workflowBundler.go, the type BundlerContext is changed to bundlerContext, and the constant pluginsKey is renamed to match. These modifications enhance naming consistency without altering the existing functionality or logic of the methods and structures.

Changes

File Change Summary
projectBundler/projectBundler.go Renamed type projectSettings to ProjectSettings; updated constant ProjectSettingsContextKey.
workflowBundler/workflowBundler.go Renamed type BundlerContext to bundlerContext; updated constant pluginsKey.

Possibly related PRs

  • Workflow bundling for runtime #4: The changes in projectBundler/projectBundler.go regarding the introduction of types and methods for project bundling are related to the main PR's modifications to the naming conventions of types and constants within the same file.
  • context support for discovery and bundling #19: The updates to the Discover method in projectBundler/projectBundler.go to include context handling are relevant as they modify the same method that remains unchanged in the main PR, indicating a focus on the same functionality.
  • Passing settings context to be used in plugins #24: The addition of context management in the projectBundler for handling project settings is directly related to the changes in the main PR, which also involves modifications to the projectSettings type and its usage in the context.

Suggested reviewers

  • davidkinde
  • DanielRivers
  • rairaman

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

codecov bot commented Nov 16, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 54.00%. Comparing base (9d9c62c) to head (83b82c7).
Report is 4 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

Impacted file tree graph

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main      #25   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   54.00%   54.00%           
=======================================
  Files          15       15           
  Lines        1759     1759           
=======================================
  Hits          950      950           
  Misses        717      717           
  Partials       92       92           
Files with missing lines Coverage Δ
projectBundler/projectBundler.go 75.39% <ø> (ø)
workflowBundler/workflowBundler.go 82.60% <ø> (ø)

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 67e05ff and 83b82c7.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • projectBundler/projectBundler.go (1 hunks)
  • workflowBundler/workflowBundler.go (1 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
  • workflowBundler/workflowBundler.go
🔇 Additional comments (2)
projectBundler/projectBundler.go (2)

18-18: LGTM! Verify context key usage patterns.

The exported type for the context key aligns with Go conventions for public APIs. The string value remains unchanged, maintaining compatibility.

Let's verify the context key usage patterns:

✅ Verification successful

✓ Context key usage is consistent and appropriate

The exported ProjectSettingsContextKey is used correctly throughout the codebase:

  • Used to store project configuration in context within the main bundler logic
  • Consistently retrieved in test assertions to verify context propagation
  • No raw string usage that bypasses the constant
  • No conflicting context key patterns found
🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for all usages of ProjectSettingsContextKey
rg -l "ProjectSettingsContextKey"

# Search for any direct string usage that might bypass the constant
rg '"projectSettings"' --type go

Length of output: 235


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the actual usage patterns in both files
rg "ProjectSettingsContextKey" -A 3 -B 3

# Let's also verify if there are any other context keys defined similarly
ast-grep --pattern 'type $_ = string'

Length of output: 1901


18-22: Verify context value type assertions across the codebase.

The change from unexported to exported type affects how context values are retrieved and type-asserted. We should verify all usage patterns to ensure compatibility.

Let's check for potential issues:

✅ Verification successful

The previous patterns didn't work well with ast-grep, so I'm using ripgrep to search for context value usage patterns and type assertions in Go files. This will help us verify the impact of the type change.


No type assertion issues found with context value usage

The search results show that the ProjectSettings type is only used in a limited scope within the projectBundler package:

  • It's defined and used as a context key constant
  • The context value is set using context.WithValue with the key
  • The value is retrieved in tests using ctx.Value without any type assertions

Since there are no explicit type assertions found and the type is only used within its own package, the change from unexported to exported type does not impact the existing context value usage patterns.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for context value retrievals that might be affected
ast-grep --pattern 'ctx.Value($key)' 

# Search for type assertions that might need updates
ast-grep --pattern '$ctx.Value($_).($_)'

Length of output: 81


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for context value usage patterns in Go files
rg -t go "ctx.*Value.*projectSettings" -A 2 -B 2

# Search for type assertions or conversions involving ProjectSettings
rg -t go "ProjectSettings.*\(" -A 2 -B 2

# Search for any usage of the ProjectSettings type
rg -t go "ProjectSettings" -A 2 -B 2

Length of output: 1748

projectBundler/projectBundler.go Show resolved Hide resolved
@evgenyk evgenyk merged commit 710beb5 into main Nov 16, 2024
4 checks passed
This was referenced Nov 18, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant