-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Fixed export #25
Fixed export #25
Conversation
WalkthroughThe pull request introduces renaming changes to types and constants in the Changes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested reviewers
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #25 +/- ##
=======================================
Coverage 54.00% 54.00%
=======================================
Files 15 15
Lines 1759 1759
=======================================
Hits 950 950
Misses 717 717
Partials 92 92
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 1
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
projectBundler/projectBundler.go
(1 hunks)workflowBundler/workflowBundler.go
(1 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
- workflowBundler/workflowBundler.go
🔇 Additional comments (2)
projectBundler/projectBundler.go (2)
18-18
: LGTM! Verify context key usage patterns.
The exported type for the context key aligns with Go conventions for public APIs. The string value remains unchanged, maintaining compatibility.
Let's verify the context key usage patterns:
✅ Verification successful
✓ Context key usage is consistent and appropriate
The exported ProjectSettingsContextKey
is used correctly throughout the codebase:
- Used to store project configuration in context within the main bundler logic
- Consistently retrieved in test assertions to verify context propagation
- No raw string usage that bypasses the constant
- No conflicting context key patterns found
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for all usages of ProjectSettingsContextKey
rg -l "ProjectSettingsContextKey"
# Search for any direct string usage that might bypass the constant
rg '"projectSettings"' --type go
Length of output: 235
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the actual usage patterns in both files
rg "ProjectSettingsContextKey" -A 3 -B 3
# Let's also verify if there are any other context keys defined similarly
ast-grep --pattern 'type $_ = string'
Length of output: 1901
18-22
: Verify context value type assertions across the codebase.
The change from unexported to exported type affects how context values are retrieved and type-asserted. We should verify all usage patterns to ensure compatibility.
Let's check for potential issues:
✅ Verification successful
The previous patterns didn't work well with ast-grep, so I'm using ripgrep to search for context value usage patterns and type assertions in Go files. This will help us verify the impact of the type change.
No type assertion issues found with context value usage
The search results show that the ProjectSettings
type is only used in a limited scope within the projectBundler
package:
- It's defined and used as a context key constant
- The context value is set using
context.WithValue
with the key - The value is retrieved in tests using
ctx.Value
without any type assertions
Since there are no explicit type assertions found and the type is only used within its own package, the change from unexported to exported type does not impact the existing context value usage patterns.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for context value retrievals that might be affected
ast-grep --pattern 'ctx.Value($key)'
# Search for type assertions that might need updates
ast-grep --pattern '$ctx.Value($_).($_)'
Length of output: 81
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for context value usage patterns in Go files
rg -t go "ctx.*Value.*projectSettings" -A 2 -B 2
# Search for type assertions or conversions involving ProjectSettings
rg -t go "ProjectSettings.*\(" -A 2 -B 2
# Search for any usage of the ProjectSettings type
rg -t go "ProjectSettings" -A 2 -B 2
Length of output: 1748
Fixed export
Checklist
🛟 If you need help, consider asking for advice over in the Kinde community.