-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 728
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
KEP-2170: Add validation to Torch numProcPerNode
field
#2409
Changes from all commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
Some generated files are not rendered by default. Learn more about how customized files appear on GitHub.
Some generated files are not rendered by default. Learn more about how customized files appear on GitHub.
Some generated files are not rendered by default. Learn more about how customized files appear on GitHub.
Some generated files are not rendered by default. Learn more about how customized files appear on GitHub.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I am also thinking about changing numProcPerNode to
IntOrString
. However, it is not a standard type in Python.Thus, users should know what does this type mean:
K8sIoApimachineryPkgUtilIntstrIntOrString
.Or we need to make
numProcPerNode: Union[int,str]
type.Do we have any plans to expose numProcPerNode parameters to the Trainer object in SDK: https://github.com/kubeflow/trainer/blob/master/sdk/kubeflow/trainer/types/types.py#L73?
Or it will be always auto-populated based on
num_nodes
andresources_per_node
?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
cc @kubeflow/wg-training-leads @Electronic-Waste
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yes, I also think there should be a parameter exposed in the SDK. It is only loosely coupled with
resources_per_node
.The Kubernetes Python client declares IntOrString fields as object, but
Union[int,str]
would be better.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
For me, I prefer
Union[int, str]
. And exposingnum_proc_per_node
is better.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Let's continue discussion here: #2313 (comment)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
As we discussed above PR, I fully agree with introducing this
IntOrString
typed.