🚨 [security] Update rack 2.0.3 → 2.2.8.1 (minor) #278
Closed
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
🚨 Your current dependencies have known security vulnerabilities 🚨
This dependency update fixes known security vulnerabilities. Please see the details below and assess their impact carefully. We recommend to merge and deploy this as soon as possible!
Here is everything you need to know about this update. Please take a good look at what changed and the test results before merging this pull request.
What changed?
Security Advisories 🚨
🚨 Denial of Service Vulnerability in Rack Content-Type Parsing
🚨 Possible DoS Vulnerability with Range Header in Rack
🚨 Possible Denial of Service Vulnerability in Rack Header Parsing
🚨 Possible Denial of Service Vulnerability in Rack Header Parsing
🚨 Possible Denial of Service Vulnerability in Rack Header Parsing
🚨 Possible Denial of Service Vulnerability in Rack’s header parsing
🚨 Possible DoS Vulnerability in Multipart MIME parsing
🚨 Possible DoS Vulnerability in Multipart MIME parsing
🚨 Possible DoS Vulnerability in Multipart MIME parsing
🚨 Denial of service via multipart parsing in Rack
🚨 Denial of service via header parsing in Rack
🚨 Denial of Service Vulnerability in Rack Content-Disposition parsing
🚨 Denial of service via header parsing in Rack
🚨 Denial of Service Vulnerability in Rack Content-Disposition parsing
🚨 Denial of service via multipart parsing in Rack
🚨 Denial of Service Vulnerability in Rack Content-Disposition parsing
🚨 Denial of service via multipart parsing in Rack
🚨 Denial of service via header parsing in Rack
🚨 Denial of Service Vulnerability in Rack Multipart Parsing
🚨 Denial of Service Vulnerability in Rack Multipart Parsing
🚨 Possible shell escape sequence injection vulnerability in Rack
🚨 Possible shell escape sequence injection vulnerability in Rack
🚨 Denial of Service Vulnerability in Rack Multipart Parsing
🚨 Possible shell escape sequence injection vulnerability in Rack
🚨 Percent-encoded cookies can be used to overwrite existing prefixed cookie names
🚨 Percent-encoded cookies can be used to overwrite existing prefixed cookie names
🚨 Directory traversal in Rack::Directory app bundled with Rack
🚨 Directory traversal in Rack::Directory app bundled with Rack
🚨 Possible information leak / session hijack vulnerability
🚨 Possible XSS vulnerability in Rack
🚨 Possible DoS vulnerability in Rack
Release Notes
2.2.8.1
2.2.7
2.2.2 (from changelog)
2.2.1 (from changelog)
2.2.0 (from changelog)
2.1.4.4
2.1.2 (from changelog)
2.1.1 (from changelog)
2.1.0 (from changelog)
2.0.9.4
2.0.8 (from changelog)
Does any of this look wrong? Please let us know.
Commits
See the full diff on Github. The new version differs by more commits than we can show here.
👉 No CI detected
You don't seem to have any Continuous Integration service set up!
Without a service that will test the Depfu branches and pull requests, we can't inform you if incoming updates actually work with your app. We think that this degrades the service we're trying to provide down to a point where it is more or less meaningless.
This is fine if you just want to give Depfu a quick try. If you want to really let Depfu help you keep your app up-to-date, we recommend setting up a CI system:
* [Circle CI](https://circleci.com), [Semaphore ](https://semaphoreci.com) and [Github Actions](https://docs.github.com/actions) are all excellent options. * If you use something like Jenkins, make sure that you're using the Github integration correctly so that it reports status data back to Github. * If you have already set up a CI for this repository, you might need to check your configuration. Make sure it will run on all new branches. If you don’t want it to run on every branch, you can whitelist branches starting with `depfu/`.Depfu will automatically keep this PR conflict-free, as long as you don't add any commits to this branch yourself. You can also trigger a rebase manually by commenting with
@depfu rebase
.All Depfu comment commands