Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

chore: translation target display issue in qtcreator #1049

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Feb 25, 2025

Conversation

18202781743
Copy link
Contributor

as title.

@deepin-ci-robot
Copy link

deepin pr auto review

在提供的代码更改中,主要添加了一个名为 IMMEDIATE_CALL 的参数到 ds_handle_package_translation 函数的调用中。这个更改没有提供足够的上下文来评估其完整的影响,但我们可以从几个方面进行一些初步的分析:

  1. 参数添加

    • 添加 IMMEDIATE_CALL 参数可能意味着这个函数现在支持立即调用翻译文件,而不是默认的延迟调用。这可能会影响翻译文件的生成和加载顺序。
  2. 代码质量

    • 如果 IMMEDIATE_CALL 参数的添加是为了提高性能或确保翻译文件在特定时刻可用,那么这个更改是合理的。但是,如果这个参数的添加没有明确的理由,或者没有相应的文档说明其用途,那么可能会降低代码的可读性和可维护性。
  3. 代码性能

    • 如果立即调用翻译文件可以减少延迟,那么这个更改可能会提高应用程序的性能。然而,如果立即调用增加了不必要的开销,那么可能会对性能产生负面影响。
  4. 代码安全性

    • 从提供的代码片段来看,没有涉及到安全性相关的更改。但是,如果 IMMEDIATE_CALL 参数的添加可能会影响文件路径或权限,那么需要确保相关的安全措施已经到位。
  5. 其他考虑

    • 如果 IMMEDIATE_CALL 参数的添加是为了支持新的功能或修复现有的问题,那么应该有相应的单元测试来验证这个更改的正确性。
    • 如果这个参数的添加会影响其他依赖这个函数的代码,那么应该检查是否有相应的更新或文档说明。

总的来说,这个更改看起来是为了支持立即调用翻译文件,但需要更多的上下文来评估其完整的影响。建议进行进一步的测试和文档更新,以确保这个更改不会引入新的问题。

@deepin-ci-robot
Copy link

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: 18202781743, yixinshark

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@18202781743
Copy link
Contributor Author

/forcemerge

@deepin-bot
Copy link

deepin-bot bot commented Feb 25, 2025

This pr force merged! (status: blocked)

@deepin-bot deepin-bot bot merged commit aef6f10 into linuxdeepin:master Feb 25, 2025
5 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants