-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 14
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
增加功能改进模板 #558
增加功能改进模板 #558
Conversation
增加功能改进模板 Signed-off-by: laokou <[email protected]>
审阅者指南 by Sourcery这个拉取请求引入了一个新的功能请求问题模板。该模板为用户提供了一种结构化的方式来提交功能请求,确保捕获所有必要的信息。 功能请求模板结构流程图flowchart TD
A[Start Feature Request] --> B[Markdown Introduction]
B --> C[Confirmation Checklist]
C --> D{All Required
Checks Complete?}
D -->|No| C
D -->|Yes| E[Feature Description]
E --> F[Reference Materials]
F --> G[End Feature Request]
文件级别变更
提示和命令与 Sourcery 交互
自定义您的体验访问您的仪表板以:
获取帮助Original review guide in EnglishReviewer's Guide by SourceryThis pull request introduces a new issue template for feature requests. This template provides a structured way for users to submit feature requests, ensuring that all necessary information is captured. Flow diagram for feature request template structureflowchart TD
A[Start Feature Request] --> B[Markdown Introduction]
B --> C[Confirmation Checklist]
C --> D{All Required
Checks Complete?}
D -->|No| C
D -->|Yes| E[Feature Description]
E --> F[Reference Materials]
F --> G[End Feature Request]
File-Level Changes
Tips and commandsInteracting with Sourcery
Customizing Your ExperienceAccess your dashboard to:
Getting Help
|
Quality Gate passedIssues Measures |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
嘿 @KouShenhai - 我已经审查了你的更改 - 以下是一些反馈:
整体评论:
- 考虑移除硬编码的受托人('livk-cloud'),以使模板更易于维护。受托人可以通过项目自动化或手动分配来管理。
- 描述字段重复 - 考虑使它们更具体和描述性,而不是多次重复'功能改进'。
以下是我在审查期间查看的内容
- 🟡 一般性问题:发现1个问题
- 🟢 安全性:一切看起来都很好
- 🟢 测试:一切看起来都很好
- 🟢 复杂性:一切看起来都很好
- 🟢 文档:一切看起来都很好
帮助我变得更有用!请对每条评论点击 👍 或 👎,我将使用这些反馈来改进你的评论。
Original comment in English
Hey @KouShenhai - I've reviewed your changes - here's some feedback:
Overall Comments:
- Consider removing the hardcoded assignee ('livk-cloud') to make the template more maintainable. Assignees can be managed through project automation or manual assignment.
- The description fields are repetitive - consider making them more specific and descriptive instead of repeating '功能改进' multiple times.
Here's what I looked at during the review
- 🟡 General issues: 1 issue found
- 🟢 Security: all looks good
- 🟢 Testing: all looks good
- 🟢 Complexity: all looks good
- 🟢 Documentation: all looks good
Help me be more useful! Please click 👍 or 👎 on each comment and I'll use the feedback to improve your reviews.
attributes: | ||
label: 功能改进 | ||
description: 请详细描述需要改进或者添加的功能。 | ||
placeholder: "功能改进" |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
建议: 考虑提供一个更具描述性的占位符,指导用户如何提出一个好的功能请求
例如,占位符可以包括预期行为、使用场景或功能的潜在好处等提示。
Original comment in English
suggestion: Consider providing a more descriptive placeholder that guides users on what makes a good feature request
For example, the placeholder could include prompts like expected behavior, use cases, or potential benefits of the feature.
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
✅ All tests successful. No failed tests found. Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #558 +/- ##
============================================
- Coverage 59.23% 59.20% -0.04%
+ Complexity 1234 1233 -1
============================================
Files 431 431
Lines 5103 5103
Branches 359 359
============================================
- Hits 3023 3021 -2
- Misses 1858 1860 +2
Partials 222 222 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
增加功能改进模板
Summary by Sourcery
文档:
Original summary in English
Summary by Sourcery
Documentation: