Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

minor fix: address small ellipsis feedback #362

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Feb 2, 2025
Merged

Conversation

dinmukhamedm
Copy link
Member

@dinmukhamedm dinmukhamedm commented Feb 2, 2025

Important

Replaces unwrap_or_else with unwrap_or for group_name default value in init_eval function in evals.rs.

  • Code Improvement:
    • Replaces unwrap_or_else with unwrap_or for group_name default value in init_eval function in evals.rs.

This description was created by Ellipsis for a11907b. It will automatically update as commits are pushed.

@dinmukhamedm dinmukhamedm merged commit a68ef49 into dev Feb 2, 2025
2 checks passed
@dinmukhamedm dinmukhamedm deleted the fix/ellipsis-comment branch February 2, 2025 08:48
Copy link
Contributor

@ellipsis-dev ellipsis-dev bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

👍 Looks good to me! Reviewed everything up to a11907b in 7 seconds

More details
  • Looked at 13 lines of code in 1 files
  • Skipped 0 files when reviewing.
  • Skipped posting 1 drafted comments based on config settings.
1. app-server/src/api/v1/evals.rs:32
  • Draft comment:
    The change from unwrap_or_else to unwrap_or is appropriate here since the default value is a simple string, which is inexpensive to construct.
  • Reason this comment was not posted:
    Confidence changes required: 0%
    The unwrap_or_else method is more efficient than unwrap_or when the default value is non-trivial to construct. In this case, the default value is a simple string, so unwrap_or is appropriate.

Workflow ID: wflow_bj8vmlLwoFEXWX1c


You can customize Ellipsis with 👍 / 👎 feedback, review rules, user-specific overrides, quiet mode, and more.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant