Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat(checker): check dmsetup package #141

Merged

Conversation

COLDTURNIP
Copy link
Contributor

Which issue(s) this PR fixes:

Issue longhorn/longhorn#8217

What this PR does / why we need it:

Add package check for device mapper.

Port from: longhorn/longhorn#8232

Special notes for your reviewer:

Additional documentation or context

longhorn/longhorn-8217

Signed-off-by: Raphanus Lo <[email protected]>
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Dec 9, 2024

Walkthrough

The changes in this pull request involve updates to the packages slice within the Init method of the Checker struct in pkg/local/preflight/checker.go. Specifically, the Apt, Yum, Zypper, and Pacman package managers have been modified to include the dmsetup and device-mapper packages. The overall structure and functionality of the Init method and other methods in the Checker struct remain unchanged.

Changes

File Change Summary
pkg/local/preflight/checker.go Updated packages slice in Init method to include dmsetup for Apt and device-mapper for Yum, Zypper, and Pacman. No other changes made.

Assessment against linked issues

Objective Addressed Explanation
Add dmsetup and dmcrypt utilities check in CLI

Possibly related PRs

Suggested reviewers

  • c3y1huang
  • innobead

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
pkg/local/preflight/checker.go (1)

Line range hint 102-156: Consider adding tests for the new package checks

The implementation would benefit from tests to verify that the package checks work correctly across different package managers.

Would you like me to help create test cases for the package checks?

📜 Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 053ec80 and b1becd5.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • pkg/local/preflight/checker.go (4 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (5)
pkg/local/preflight/checker.go (5)

102-102: LGTM: Correct package name for Apt-based systems

The addition of dmsetup package is correct for Debian/Ubuntu-based systems and aligns with the PR objectives.


138-138: LGTM: Correct package name for SUSE-based systems

The addition of device-mapper package is correct for SUSE/openSUSE systems and maintains consistency with other RPM-based distributions.


156-156: LGTM: Correct package name for Arch-based systems

The addition of device-mapper package is correct for Arch Linux systems and maintains consistency with other distributions.


Line range hint 102-156: Note: dmcrypt implementation pending

The linked issue #8217 mentions checking both dmsetup and dmcrypt utilities, but only dmsetup is implemented in this PR. Is dmcrypt planned for a separate PR?


120-120: LGTM: Correct package name for RHEL-based systems

The addition of device-mapper package is correct for RHEL/CentOS-based systems, as it provides the dmsetup utility.

✅ Verification successful

Let me try another verification approach to check the package dependencies and naming patterns in the codebase.


Based on the search results from the codebase, I can now verify the package naming. The ripgrep results show that device-mapper is consistently used across different package managers in the codebase:

  1. For Yum (RHEL/CentOS): "nfs-utils", "iscsi-initiator-utils", "cryptsetup", "device-mapper"
  2. For Zypper/Transactional Update: "nfs-client", "open-iscsi", "cryptsetup", "device-mapper"
  3. For Pacman: "nfs-utils", "open-iscsi", "cryptsetup", "device-mapper"

While for Apt (Debian/Ubuntu), it uses dmsetup:

"nfs-common", "open-iscsi", "cryptsetup", "dmsetup"

This is consistent with the package naming conventions in these distributions - RHEL/CentOS and other RPM-based systems provide the dmsetup utility through the device-mapper package, while Debian/Ubuntu provide it through the dmsetup package.

LGTM: Package name is correct for RHEL-based systems

The use of device-mapper package is correct for RHEL/CentOS systems, as it provides the required dmsetup utility. The package naming is also consistent with other package managers in the codebase.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Verify that device-mapper package provides dmsetup in RHEL/CentOS
rg -A 5 "provides.*dmsetup" || echo "No direct package info found"

# Alternative check for package naming consistency across distributions
fd -t f "device-mapper|dmsetup" || echo "No package files found"

Length of output: 130


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for package-related configurations and dependencies
rg -i "device-mapper|dmsetup" -A 3 -B 3

# Look for package installation or dependency patterns
ast-grep --pattern 'packages = []string{$$$}'

# Check for any documentation or comments about package requirements
fd README -t f -X cat

Length of output: 68539

Copy link
Member

@derekbit derekbit left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@derekbit derekbit merged commit c026165 into longhorn:master Dec 9, 2024
7 checks passed
@derekbit
Copy link
Member

derekbit commented Dec 9, 2024

@mergify backport v1.7.x

Copy link

mergify bot commented Dec 9, 2024

backport v1.7.x

✅ Backports have been created

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants