-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
heart rate, cadence, temperature, speed, and power #17
base: master
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
Bumps [flask](https://github.com/pallets/flask) from 1.1.2 to 2.3.2. - [Release notes](https://github.com/pallets/flask/releases) - [Changelog](https://github.com/pallets/flask/blob/main/CHANGES.rst) - [Commits](pallets/flask@1.1.2...2.3.2) --- updated-dependencies: - dependency-name: flask dependency-type: direct:production ... Signed-off-by: dependabot[bot] <[email protected]>
Bumps [requests](https://github.com/psf/requests) from 2.23.0 to 2.31.0. - [Release notes](https://github.com/psf/requests/releases) - [Changelog](https://github.com/psf/requests/blob/main/HISTORY.md) - [Commits](psf/requests@v2.23.0...v2.31.0) --- updated-dependencies: - dependency-name: requests dependency-type: direct:production ... Signed-off-by: dependabot[bot] <[email protected]>
…peed, power, as available.
Thank you very much! I'll have a look as soon as I can |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Last week I had to update this file because for some reason Pip wasn't installing Flask dependencies (the MR doesn't contain these changes, it needs to be rebased), so I had to explicitly list them here (see #16). I'm wondering whether we need to update these dependencies or if we can just remove them (assuming that when installing flask
2.3.2 Pip will automatically pull jinja2
, werkzeug
and itsdangerous
)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
You are right, I'll rebase this commit.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Do we need this file? As far as I can see it was used to verify that some code changes were still producing a valid GPX, but I think we can remove it now?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Hmmm, I will try to make a better unit test system that doesn't depend on the patch file and doesn't depend on pulling data down from the network.
Before I start, though, do you think I should use unittest?
https://docs.python.org/3/library/unittest.html
Or something different?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
In addition to unittest, here are two others mentioned in the docs:
I've never used any of these, but I'll use the one you recommend.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Probably I misinterpreted the code here: I thought that test.sh
was only used to validate code changes (i.e. apply a patch and validate the output against an xsd), that's why I wasn't sure if they belong here. If that's not the case, I see no harm in keeping them.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Same as the other patch file
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Same as the patch files
It's my yearly pull request!