[WEB-2762] chore: loader code refactor #5992
Conversation
WalkthroughThis pull request includes modifications to multiple loader components across the codebase, specifically updating the mapping functions used to generate arrays of JSX elements. The changes involve replacing the previous array generation methods with Changes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested reviewers
Warning Rate limit exceeded@anmolsinghbhatia has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 15 minutes and 4 seconds before requesting another review. ⌛ How to resolve this issue?After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit. 🚦 How do rate limits work?CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization. Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout. Please see our FAQ for further information. 📜 Recent review detailsConfiguration used: CodeRabbit UI 📒 Files selected for processing (30)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (30)
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (2)
web/core/components/ui/loader/settings/activity.tsx (1)
5-5: LGTM! Consider a minor optimization.The change to use
(_, i)improves readability by explicitly showing the first parameter is unused.Consider using
Array.from()instead of spread operator with Array constructor for better performance:- {[...Array(10)].map((_, i) => ( + {Array.from({ length: 10 }).map((_, i) => (web/core/components/pages/loaders/page-loader.tsx (1)
20-20: Consider optimizing array creationWhile the current implementation works, consider using
new Array(10).fill(null)instead ofArray.from(Array(10))for better readability and performance.-{Array.from(Array(10)).map((_, i) => ( +{new Array(10).fill(null).map((_, i) => (
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (15)
web/core/components/pages/loaders/page-loader.tsx(1 hunks)web/core/components/ui/loader/cycle-module-board-loader.tsx(1 hunks)web/core/components/ui/loader/cycle-module-list-loader.tsx(1 hunks)web/core/components/ui/loader/layouts/project-inbox/inbox-sidebar-loader.tsx(1 hunks)web/core/components/ui/loader/notification-loader.tsx(1 hunks)web/core/components/ui/loader/pages-loader.tsx(1 hunks)web/core/components/ui/loader/projects-loader.tsx(1 hunks)web/core/components/ui/loader/settings/activity.tsx(1 hunks)web/core/components/ui/loader/settings/api-token.tsx(1 hunks)web/core/components/ui/loader/settings/email.tsx(1 hunks)web/core/components/ui/loader/settings/import-and-export.tsx(1 hunks)web/core/components/ui/loader/settings/integration.tsx(1 hunks)web/core/components/ui/loader/settings/members.tsx(1 hunks)web/core/components/ui/loader/view-list-loader.tsx(1 hunks)web/core/components/workspace-notifications/sidebar/loader.tsx(1 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (6)
- web/core/components/ui/loader/layouts/project-inbox/inbox-sidebar-loader.tsx
- web/core/components/ui/loader/pages-loader.tsx
- web/core/components/ui/loader/settings/api-token.tsx
- web/core/components/ui/loader/settings/import-and-export.tsx
- web/core/components/ui/loader/settings/integration.tsx
- web/core/components/ui/loader/settings/members.tsx
🔇 Additional comments (8)
web/core/components/ui/loader/notification-loader.tsx (1)
3-3: LGTM! Clean improvement to parameter naming.
The explicit underscore for the unused parameter improves code clarity while maintaining the necessary index parameter for React keys. This change aligns well with the broader refactoring pattern across loader components.
web/core/components/workspace-notifications/sidebar/loader.tsx (1)
3-3: LGTM! Clean and consistent parameter naming.
The change from (i) to (_, i) in the map function improves code clarity by explicitly indicating that the first parameter is intentionally unused. This follows a consistent pattern being implemented across other loader components in the codebase.
web/core/components/ui/loader/view-list-loader.tsx (1)
3-3: LGTM! The parameter renaming improves code clarity.
The change from (i) to (_, i) explicitly indicates that the array element is unused while maintaining the index for the key prop, following TypeScript best practices.
Let's verify this pattern is consistently applied across other loader components:
✅ Verification successful
Pattern is consistently applied across all loader components ✅
The verification confirms that all loader components in the codebase consistently use the (_, i) pattern in their Array.map() functions. This includes:
- Main loader components (view-list, projects, pages, notifications)
- Settings loaders (members, integration, email, etc.)
- Layout loaders (spreadsheet, list, calendar, gantt)
The change aligns with the codebase-wide convention and improves code clarity by explicitly indicating unused parameters.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check if other loader components follow the same pattern
# Expected: All loader components should use (_, i) in their map functions
# Search for map functions in loader components
rg --type typescript --type tsx "map\((i|_,\s*i)" web/core/components/ui/loader/
Length of output: 117
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's try a different approach to search for map functions in loader components
# without relying on file type recognition
# Search for map functions in all files under the loader directory
rg "map\((i|_,\s*i)" web/core/components/ui/loader/
Length of output: 53
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's first check what files exist in the loader directory
# and then examine their content for map functions
# List all files in the loader directory
ls -la web/core/components/ui/loader/
# Then let's look at the content of view-list-loader.tsx to verify our pattern
cat web/core/components/ui/loader/view-list-loader.tsx
# Also search for any other files with similar patterns using a more general search
rg "Array\(" web/core/components/ui/loader/
Length of output: 4220
web/core/components/ui/loader/settings/email.tsx (1)
Line range hint 11-21: LGTM! Clean and consistent parameter naming.
The change from (i) to (_, i) in the map function improves code clarity by explicitly indicating that the first parameter is unused. This aligns well with the broader loader code refactor and follows TypeScript/JavaScript best practices for handling unused parameters.
web/core/components/pages/loaders/page-loader.tsx (1)
20-20: LGTM! Clear indication of unused parameter
The change from (i) to (_, i) in the mapping function follows best practices by explicitly indicating the unused parameter.
web/core/components/ui/loader/cycle-module-list-loader.tsx (1)
5-5: LGTM! Parameter naming improves code clarity.
The change from i to (_, i) in the map function explicitly indicates that the array element is unused, which improves code readability.
Let's verify this pattern is consistently applied across other loader components:
✅ Verification successful
Pattern is consistently applied across loader components ✓
The verification confirms that all loader components in the codebase consistently use the (_, i) or (_, index) pattern in their Array.map() functions, indicating proper unused parameter naming conventions. This change aligns with the established pattern across the codebase.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for consistency of map function parameter naming in loader components
# Expected: All loader components should use (_, i) pattern for unused array elements
# Search for map functions in loader components
rg --type typescript --type tsx "Array\([0-9]+\)\]\.map\(" web/core/components/ui/loader/
Length of output: 126
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's try a different approach to search for map functions in loader components
# Using ripgrep without file type filters and adding context for better analysis
rg -A 2 "Array\([0-9]+\)]\.map" web/core/components/ui/loader/
Length of output: 6969
web/core/components/ui/loader/projects-loader.tsx (1)
4-4: LGTM! Clear parameter usage in map function.
The change from map((i) =>...) to map((_, i) => ...) improves code clarity by explicitly indicating that the first parameter is unused. This is consistent with the broader loader code refactoring effort across the codebase.
web/core/components/ui/loader/cycle-module-board-loader.tsx (1)
5-5: LGTM! Clean improvement to parameter naming.
The explicit use of _ for the unused parameter in the mapping function improves code clarity by following TypeScript/JavaScript conventions for unused parameters. This change is consistent with similar improvements across other loader components.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (10)
web/core/components/issues/workspace-draft/loader.tsx (1)
16-18: LGTM! Consider adding type annotation for better maintainability.The change to
rangeand using underscore for unused parameter improves code clarity. Consider adding a type annotation to the map parameters for better maintainability.- {range(items).map((_, index) => ( + {range(items).map((_: number, index: number) => (web/core/components/ui/loader/layouts/members-layout-loader.tsx (1)
9-11: Consider extracting magic numbers as named constants.While the implementation is correct, the magic numbers
5and2in the range functions could be extracted as named constants to improve maintainability and documentation.+const COLUMN_COUNT = 5; +const CARDS_PER_COLUMN = 2; export const MembersLayoutLoader = () => ( <div className="flex gap-5 py-1.5 overflow-x-auto"> - {range(5).map((_, columnIndex) => ( + {range(COLUMN_COUNT).map((_, columnIndex) => ( <div key={columnIndex} className="flex flex-col gap-3"> <div className={`flex items-center justify-between h-9 ${columnIndex === 0 ? "w-80" : "w-36"}`}> <span className="h-6 w-24 bg-custom-background-80 rounded animate-pulse" /> </div> - {range(2).map((_, cardIndex) => ( + {range(CARDS_PER_COLUMN).map((_, cardIndex) => ( <span className="h-8 w-full bg-custom-background-80 rounded animate-pulse" key={cardIndex} /> ))} </div> ))} </div> );web/core/components/ui/loader/layouts/calendar-layout-loader.tsx (1)
23-33: Consider using named constants for grid dimensions.While the implementation is correct, the magic numbers (5 and 6) used in range() could be more maintainable as named constants.
Consider this improvement:
+const GRID_COLUMNS = 5; +const GRID_ROWS = 6; export const CalendarLayoutLoader = () => ( <div className="h-full w-full overflow-y-auto bg-custom-background-100 animate-pulse"> <span className="relative grid divide-x-[0.5px] divide-custom-border-200 text-sm font-medium grid-cols-5"> - {range(5).map((_, index) => ( + {range(GRID_COLUMNS).map((_, index) => ( <span key={index} className="h-11 w-full bg-custom-background-80" /> ))} </span> <div className="h-full w-full overflow-y-auto"> <div className="grid h-full w-full grid-cols-1 divide-y-[0.5px] divide-custom-border-200 overflow-y-auto"> - {range(6).map((_, index) => ( + {range(GRID_ROWS).map((_, index) => ( <div key={index} className="grid divide-x-[0.5px] divide-custom-border-200 grid-cols-5"> - {range(5).map((_, index) => ( + {range(GRID_COLUMNS).map((_, index) => ( <CalendarDay key={index} /> ))} </div> ))} </div> </div> </div> );web/core/components/ui/loader/layouts/kanban-layout-loader.tsx (1)
36-38: LGTM: Clean implementation of the mapping refactorThe change to use
lodash/rangeimproves code clarity while maintaining the same functionality. The proper use of underscore for unused parameters follows best practices.Consider adding type annotations to the mapping function parameters for better type safety:
- {range(cardsInColumn).map((_, cardIndex) => ( + {range(cardsInColumn).map((_: never, cardIndex: number) => (web/core/components/ui/loader/layouts/spreadsheet-layout-loader.tsx (2)
Line range hint
15-21: LGTM! Consider adding type safetyThe refactor to use
rangeimproves readability. Since this is TypeScript, consider adding type annotations to the mapping function parameters for better maintainability.- {range(props.columnCount).map((_, colIndex) => ( + {range(props.columnCount).map((_: never, colIndex: number) => (
Line range hint
31-43: Consider making the grid dimensions configurableThe component uses hardcoded values (10 columns, 16 rows) which could limit its reusability. Consider making these configurable via props and potentially memoizing the component for better performance with large grids.
-export const SpreadsheetLayoutLoader = () => ( +interface SpreadsheetLayoutLoaderProps { + rowCount?: number; + columnCount?: number; +} + +export const SpreadsheetLayoutLoader = React.memo(({ + rowCount = 16, + columnCount = 10 +}: SpreadsheetLayoutLoaderProps) => ( <div className="horizontal-scroll-enable h-full w-full overflow-y-auto "> <table> <thead> <tr> <th className="h-11 min-w-[28rem] bg-custom-background-90 border-r border-custom-border-200 animate-pulse" /> - {range(10).map((_, index) => ( + {range(columnCount).map((_: never, index: number) => ( <th key={index} className="h-11 w-full min-w-[8rem] bg-custom-background-90 border-r border-custom-border-200 animate-pulse" /> ))} </tr> </thead> <tbody> - {range(16).map((_, rowIndex) => ( - <SpreadsheetIssueRowLoader key={rowIndex} columnCount={10} /> + {range(rowCount).map((_: never, rowIndex: number) => ( + <SpreadsheetIssueRowLoader key={rowIndex} columnCount={columnCount} /> ))} </tbody> </table> - </div> + </div> +))web/core/components/ui/loader/layouts/gantt-layout-loader.tsx (2)
7-7: Minor improvements for cleaner codeConsider these nitpicks:
- Remove the trailing space in
"px-6 "- Consider moving the inline style to a constant since
BLOCK_HEIGHTis already imported- <div className="flex w-full items-center gap-4 px-6 " style={{ height: `${BLOCK_HEIGHT}px` }}> + <div className="flex w-full items-center gap-4 px-6" style={{ height: `${BLOCK_HEIGHT}px` }}>
Line range hint
27-54: Consider memoizing random length calculationsThe
getRandomLengthutility is called multiple times during rendering. Consider memoizing these values to prevent unnecessary recalculations during re-renders, especially since this is a loading component that might re-render frequently.Example approach:
const memoizedLengths = useMemo(() => ({ widths: Array(6).fill(null).map(() => getRandomLength(["32", "52", "72"])), paddings: Array(6).fill(null).map(() => getRandomLength(["115px", "208px", "260px"])) }), []);Then use these pre-calculated values in your map functions:
- <span className={`h-6 w-40 w-${getRandomLength(["32", "52", "72"])} bg-custom-background-80 rounded`} /> + <span className={`h-6 w-40 w-${memoizedLengths.widths[index]} bg-custom-background-80 rounded`} />web/core/components/ui/loader/layouts/list-layout-loader.tsx (1)
Line range hint
33-49: LGTM! Consider adding type annotations for better maintainability.The refactor to use
rangeimproves readability. The underscore for the unused parameter follows common conventions.Consider adding type annotations to the map callback for better maintainability:
-{range(defaultPropertyCount).map((_, index) => ( +{range(defaultPropertyCount).map((_: number, index: number) => (web/core/components/web-hooks/form/secret-key.tsx (1)
106-108: Consider deriving the number of dots from the secret key length.The change to use
range(30)with lodash is good. However, the number of dots (30) seems arbitrary. Consider deriving this from the actual secret key length for a more accurate visual representation.- {range(30).map((_, index) => ( + {range(webhookSecretKey?.length ?? 30).map((_, index) => ( <div key={index} className="h-1 w-1 rounded-full bg-custom-text-400 flex-shrink-0" /> ))}
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (30)
packages/ui/src/dropdown/common/loader.tsx(1 hunks)web/app/[workspaceSlug]/(projects)/projects/(detail)/[projectId]/settings/sidebar.tsx(2 hunks)web/core/components/dashboard/widgets/loaders/issues-by-state-group.tsx(2 hunks)web/core/components/dashboard/widgets/loaders/overview-stats.tsx(1 hunks)web/core/components/dashboard/widgets/loaders/recent-activity.tsx(1 hunks)web/core/components/dashboard/widgets/loaders/recent-collaborators.tsx(1 hunks)web/core/components/dashboard/widgets/loaders/recent-projects.tsx(1 hunks)web/core/components/issues/workspace-draft/loader.tsx(2 hunks)web/core/components/pages/loaders/page-loader.tsx(2 hunks)web/core/components/ui/loader/cycle-module-board-loader.tsx(1 hunks)web/core/components/ui/loader/cycle-module-list-loader.tsx(1 hunks)web/core/components/ui/loader/layouts/calendar-layout-loader.tsx(2 hunks)web/core/components/ui/loader/layouts/gantt-layout-loader.tsx(3 hunks)web/core/components/ui/loader/layouts/kanban-layout-loader.tsx(2 hunks)web/core/components/ui/loader/layouts/list-layout-loader.tsx(3 hunks)web/core/components/ui/loader/layouts/members-layout-loader.tsx(1 hunks)web/core/components/ui/loader/layouts/project-inbox/inbox-sidebar-loader.tsx(1 hunks)web/core/components/ui/loader/layouts/spreadsheet-layout-loader.tsx(4 hunks)web/core/components/ui/loader/notification-loader.tsx(1 hunks)web/core/components/ui/loader/pages-loader.tsx(1 hunks)web/core/components/ui/loader/projects-loader.tsx(1 hunks)web/core/components/ui/loader/settings/activity.tsx(1 hunks)web/core/components/ui/loader/settings/api-token.tsx(1 hunks)web/core/components/ui/loader/settings/email.tsx(2 hunks)web/core/components/ui/loader/settings/import-and-export.tsx(1 hunks)web/core/components/ui/loader/settings/integration.tsx(1 hunks)web/core/components/ui/loader/settings/members.tsx(1 hunks)web/core/components/ui/loader/view-list-loader.tsx(1 hunks)web/core/components/web-hooks/form/secret-key.tsx(2 hunks)web/core/components/workspace-notifications/sidebar/loader.tsx(1 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (15)
- web/core/components/pages/loaders/page-loader.tsx
- web/core/components/ui/loader/cycle-module-board-loader.tsx
- web/core/components/ui/loader/cycle-module-list-loader.tsx
- web/core/components/ui/loader/layouts/project-inbox/inbox-sidebar-loader.tsx
- web/core/components/ui/loader/notification-loader.tsx
- web/core/components/ui/loader/pages-loader.tsx
- web/core/components/ui/loader/projects-loader.tsx
- web/core/components/ui/loader/settings/activity.tsx
- web/core/components/ui/loader/settings/api-token.tsx
- web/core/components/ui/loader/settings/email.tsx
- web/core/components/ui/loader/settings/import-and-export.tsx
- web/core/components/ui/loader/settings/integration.tsx
- web/core/components/ui/loader/settings/members.tsx
- web/core/components/ui/loader/view-list-loader.tsx
- web/core/components/workspace-notifications/sidebar/loader.tsx
🔇 Additional comments (26)
packages/ui/src/dropdown/common/loader.tsx (2)
1-1: LGTM! Good choice using lodash/range
Using lodash/range is more explicit and maintainable than Array.from. The targeted import ensures we only include the specific utility needed.
6-7: LGTM! Clean and well-structured mapping implementation
The changes demonstrate several good practices:
- Using
_to denote unused parameters - Consistent use of
indexas the iterator variable - Proper usage of
keyprop for list items
web/core/components/dashboard/widgets/loaders/overview-stats.tsx (2)
3-3: LGTM! Good choice using Lodash's range.
Using range from Lodash is more readable and concise than Array.from({ length: 4 }) for generating sequential numbers.
Line range hint 9-14: LGTM! Improved readability with unused parameter.
Good practice using _ to explicitly indicate the unused array element parameter in the map function, while maintaining the index for the key prop.
web/core/components/issues/workspace-draft/loader.tsx (2)
4-4: LGTM! Good choice with direct import.
The direct import of range from lodash is the preferred approach for better tree-shaking.
16-18: Verify consistent implementation across loader components.
The AI summary mentions similar changes in other components. Let's verify the consistency of this pattern.
web/core/components/dashboard/widgets/loaders/recent-collaborators.tsx (2)
3-3: LGTM! Good choice using the specific lodash import.
Using the specific import path lodash/range is optimal for tree-shaking and bundle size optimization.
9-9: LGTM! Consider key generation strategy.
The refactor improves readability by:
- Using
range(8)instead ofArray.from - Using
_to explicitly indicate the unused parameter
While using the index as a key works here since the items are static and won't be reordered, consider using a more stable key if this component evolves to handle dynamic data in the future.
Let's verify if this key pattern is consistent across other loader components:
✅ Verification successful
Using index as key is consistent with loader patterns across the codebase
The verification shows that using index as key in range-mapped loader components is a consistent pattern throughout the codebase. All loader components follow similar patterns where they:
- Use
range()with a fixed number - Map with
(_, index)or(_, i)parameter naming - Implicitly use the index as key
This is acceptable for loader/skeleton components since:
- The items are static placeholders
- The order never changes
- The components are purely presentational
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for similar loader mapping patterns to verify consistency
rg -U "range\([0-9]+\)\.map\([^)]+\)" --type tsx
Length of output: 78
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for similar loader mapping patterns with broader file extensions
rg -U "range\([0-9]+\)\.map\([^)]+\)" --type ts --type jsx --type tsx -g "**/*.{ts,tsx,jsx}"
# Also search for Array.from patterns to compare
rg -U "Array\.from\([^)]+\)\.map\([^)]+\)" --type ts --type jsx --type tsx -g "**/*.{ts,tsx,jsx}"
# Look for other map operations in loader components
fd "loader" -e ts -e tsx -e jsx --exec rg -U "\.map\(" {} || true
Length of output: 1482
web/core/components/ui/loader/layouts/members-layout-loader.tsx (2)
1-1: LGTM! Good use of direct import.
The direct import from lodash/range is optimal for tree-shaking and bundle size optimization.
4-8: LGTM! Clean implementation of the loader mapping.
The change to range().map() improves readability while maintaining the same functionality. Good use of semantic variable naming with columnIndex.
web/core/components/dashboard/widgets/loaders/recent-projects.tsx (2)
Line range hint 10-19: LGTM! Clean and improved implementation
The changes improve code readability while maintaining the same functionality:
- Using
range(5)is more concise thanArray.from({ length: 5 }) - Using underscore for unused parameter follows common conventions
- Proper usage of key prop for the mapped elements
3-3: Verify consistency of lodash imports across the codebase
The modular import of range from lodash is good for tree-shaking. Let's ensure this pattern is consistent across other files.
✅ Verification successful
Lodash import pattern is consistent across the codebase
The modular import of range from lodash follows the established pattern in the codebase. The search results show that all lodash imports consistently use the modular format import {function} from "lodash/{function}", including other loader components that also use the range function.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check if other files use the same import pattern for lodash
rg "import.*from.*lodash" --type tsx --type ts
Length of output: 76
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check lodash imports using ripgrep without file type filters
rg "import.*from.*lodash"
Length of output: 25026
web/core/components/dashboard/widgets/loaders/recent-activity.tsx (2)
3-3: LGTM! Good choice using lodash's range utility.
Using range from lodash improves code readability compared to Array.from({ length: 7 }).
10-10: LGTM! Clean and idiomatic code.
The changes improve readability while maintaining the same functionality:
- Using
range(7)is more concise thanArray.from - Using
_for unused parameter follows common conventions
web/core/components/dashboard/widgets/loaders/issues-by-state-group.tsx (2)
3-3: LGTM! Good choice using modular import.
The modular import of range from lodash is the recommended approach as it helps with tree-shaking and bundle size optimization.
18-20: LGTM! Clean and readable array iteration.
The change to range(5).map() improves code readability while maintaining the same functionality. Good use of underscore for the unused parameter, and the index is appropriately used as a key for these static loader items.
web/core/components/ui/loader/layouts/calendar-layout-loader.tsx (2)
1-1: LGTM! Optimal lodash import.
The modular import from lodash is the recommended approach as it helps with tree-shaking and bundle size optimization.
6-6: LGTM! Clean array generation implementation.
The refactored code using range().map() is more readable and maintainable than the previous Array.from implementation while maintaining the same functionality.
web/core/components/ui/loader/layouts/kanban-layout-loader.tsx (1)
2-2: LGTM: Consistent with the refactor strategy
The addition of lodash/range import aligns with the PR's objective of standardizing array generation across loader components.
web/core/components/ui/loader/layouts/spreadsheet-layout-loader.tsx (1)
1-1: LGTM! Good use of targeted lodash import
Using the specific import path lodash/range instead of importing the entire lodash library is optimal for bundle size.
web/app/[workspaceSlug]/(projects)/projects/(detail)/[projectId]/settings/sidebar.tsx (2)
4-4: LGTM! Good use of targeted lodash import.
Using the specific lodash function import is optimal for tree-shaking and bundle size.
33-35: LGTM! Clean loader mapping implementation.
The change to range(8) improves readability and follows functional programming conventions with _ for unused parameters.
Let's verify consistency across other loader components:
✅ Verification successful
LGTM! The loader mapping pattern is consistent across the codebase
The search results confirm that:
- The
range(n).map((_, index) => ...)pattern is consistently used across loader components - Only one instance of the old
[...Array(n)]pattern was found in a different context (list group component) - No instances of
Array(n).fill().map()were found
The change aligns with the established pattern in the codebase, making it more maintainable and readable.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for consistency in loader implementations
# Expected results: Similar patterns using range() and _ for unused parameters
# Search for loader mapping patterns
echo "Checking loader mapping patterns..."
rg -U "range\([0-9]+\)\.map\([^)]+\)" --type tsx
# Search for potential inconsistent implementations
echo "Checking for potential inconsistent implementations..."
rg -U "Array\([0-9]+\)\.fill\(\)\.map\([^)]+\)" --type tsx
Length of output: 367
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's try with ts/tsx files without specifying file type
echo "Checking loader mapping patterns..."
rg -U "range\([0-9]+\)\.map\([^)]+\)" ".*\.(ts|tsx)$"
echo "Checking for potential inconsistent implementations..."
rg -U "Array\([0-9]+\)\.fill\(\)\.map\([^)]+\)" ".*\.(ts|tsx)$"
# Also check for other array generation patterns
echo "Checking for other array generation patterns..."
rg -U "\[\.\.\.(Array|new Array)\([0-9]+\)\]\.map\([^)]+\)" ".*\.(ts|tsx)$"
Length of output: 666
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# First, let's find all TypeScript/React files
echo "Finding TypeScript/React files..."
fd -e ts -e tsx
# Then search within these files using xargs
echo "Checking loader mapping patterns..."
fd -e ts -e tsx | xargs rg -U "range\([0-9]+\)\.map\([^)]+\)"
echo "Checking for potential inconsistent implementations..."
fd -e ts -e tsx | xargs rg -U "Array\([0-9]+\)\.fill\(\)\.map\([^)]+\)"
echo "Checking for spread array patterns..."
fd -e ts -e tsx | xargs rg -U "\[\.\.\.(Array|new Array)\([0-9]+\)\]\.map\([^)]+\)"
Length of output: 134701
web/core/components/ui/loader/layouts/gantt-layout-loader.tsx (1)
1-1: Good optimization using lodash/range!
Using lodash/range instead of spread operator ([...Array(n)]) is a better approach as it:
- Is more performant for array generation
- Provides better tree-shaking by importing only the needed function
- Results in more readable code
web/core/components/ui/loader/layouts/list-layout-loader.tsx (2)
2-2: LGTM! Good choice using lodash's range.
The change to use lodash's range function is a good improvement over Array.from(Array(n)). It's more readable and performant.
68-70: LGTM! Consistent with the previous changes.
The refactor maintains consistency with the earlier changes, using range and proper key props.
web/core/components/web-hooks/form/secret-key.tsx (1)
4-4: LGTM! Using path-based import for better tree-shaking.
The import of range from lodash/range follows best practices for tree-shaking optimization.
Summary:
This PR includes code refactoring for loader mapping.
Reference:
[WEB-2762]
Summary by CodeRabbit
Release Notes
Bug Fixes
New Features
All components continue to function as before, with no changes to their visual output or structure.