Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Clarify docs on Role based access control #986

Open
antejavor opened this issue Sep 11, 2024 · 1 comment · May be fixed by #988
Open

Clarify docs on Role based access control #986

antejavor opened this issue Sep 11, 2024 · 1 comment · May be fixed by #988
Assignees
Labels
priority: low (improvements) An idea how the representation of knowledge on a certain page could be improved

Comments

@antejavor
Copy link
Contributor

It looks like you need these permissions to create some node or relationship:

CREATE DATABASE db;
GRANT ALL PRIVILEGES TO user;
GRANT DATABASE * TO user;
GRANT CREATE_DELETE ON LABELS * TO user;
GRANT CREATE_DELETE ON EDGE_TYPES * TO user;
SHOW USERS;

It is not sufficient to do GRANT ALL PRIVILEGES TO user; GRANT DATABASE * TO user;

We should revisit: https://memgraph.com/docs/database-management/authentication-and-authorization/role-based-access-control

Context: https://discord.com/channels/842007348272169002/1278498722270937158/1283321686376190054

@antejavor antejavor added the priority: low (improvements) An idea how the representation of knowledge on a certain page could be improved label Sep 11, 2024
@hal-eisen-MG hal-eisen-MG self-assigned this Sep 11, 2024
@hal-eisen-MG
Copy link
Contributor

Some new documentation was added in https://memgraph.com/docs/database-management/multi-tenancy

@hal-eisen-MG hal-eisen-MG linked a pull request Sep 12, 2024 that will close this issue
10 tasks
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
priority: low (improvements) An idea how the representation of knowledge on a certain page could be improved
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

2 participants