[Snyk] Security upgrade tronweb from 2.10.2 to 5.3.2

[mongoloidkhulmikuki366385]

This PR was automatically created by Snyk using the credentials of a real user.

Snyk has created this PR to fix one or more vulnerable packages in the `npm` dependencies of this project.

Changes included in this PR

• Changes to the following files to upgrade the vulnerable dependencies to a fixed version:
  • js-sdk/package.json

Vulnerabilities that will be fixed

With an upgrade:

Severity	Priority Score (*)	Issue	Breaking Change	Exploit Maturity
	676/1000 Why? Proof of Concept exploit, Has a fix available, CVSS 7.1	Cross-site Request Forgery (CSRF) SNYK-JS-AXIOS-6032459	Yes	Proof of Concept
	586/1000 Why? Proof of Concept exploit, Has a fix available, CVSS 5.3	Regular Expression Denial of Service (ReDoS) SNYK-JS-AXIOS-6124857	Yes	Proof of Concept
	589/1000 Why? Has a fix available, CVSS 7.5	Prototype Pollution SNYK-JS-AXIOS-6144788	Yes	No Known Exploit

(*) Note that the real score may have changed since the PR was raised.

Commit messages

Package name: tronweb

The new version differs by 250 commits.

• 3a81bf1 Merge pull request #480 from tronprotocol/release/v5.3.2
• 9e59a03 feat: compat with ledger
• 50e77f8 fix: change unit tests for getBandwidthPrices & getEnergyPrices
• 14c3438 Merge branch 'release/v5.3.2' of github.com:tronprotocol/tronweb into release/v5.3.2
• 0223b8e fix: replace named import with default export module
• 5d5ba3b feat: using trongrid api parameter
• 4eae496 feat: update readme
• 43677b1 feat: ecRecover returns base58 format
• 7ce7971 fix: npm audit fix
• fb263c3 docs: add recent history
• eb04762 feat: add ecRecover
• fd886a3 feat: update code according to test result
• b2c610d chore: npm audit update
• 0bfd473 fix: issue 422
• 16a8760 fix: issue 429
• 972c03e feat: Support multi-dimension address array such as address[][]
• afe95a5 feat: support tip-586
• a2d483c feat: add function verifyTransactionIdSigner
• e8a0cdb feat: add function verifyTransactionSigner
• 8afa6ee feat: using Signature.from to replace custom signature
• adfd235 feat: support inject block header info when building transaction locally
• 4fffc59 feat: add v5.3.1 recent history
• cd30451 Merge pull request https://troncloud.io/r/57550 tronprotocol/sun-network#409 from tronprotocol/release/v5.3.1
• f87a482 chore: fix version number

See the full diff

Check the changes in this PR to ensure they won't cause issues with your project.

---

Note: You are seeing this because you or someone else with access to this repository has authorized Snyk to open fix PRs.

For more information:
🧐 View latest project report

🛠 Adjust project settings

📚 Read more about Snyk's upgrade and patch logic

---

Learn how to fix vulnerabilities with free interactive lessons:

🦉 Cross-site Request Forgery (CSRF)
🦉 Regular Expression Denial of Service (ReDoS)
🦉 Prototype Pollution

[performance-testing-bot]

Unable to locate .performanceTestingBot config file

[pull-request-quantifier-deprecated]

This PR has 2 quantified lines of changes. In general, a change size of upto 200 lines is ideal for the best PR experience!

---

Quantification details

Label      : Extra Small
Size       : +1 -1
Percentile : 0.8%

Total files changed: 1

Change summary by file extension:
.json : +1 -1

Change counts above are quantified counts, based on the PullRequestQuantifier customizations.

Why proper sizing of changes matters

Optimal pull request sizes drive a better predictable PR flow as they strike a
balance between between PR complexity and PR review overhead. PRs within the
optimal size (typical small, or medium sized PRs) mean:

• Fast and predictable releases to production:
  • Optimal size changes are more likely to be reviewed faster with fewer
    iterations.
  • Similarity in low PR complexity drives similar review times.
• Review quality is likely higher as complexity is lower:
  • Bugs are more likely to be detected.
  • Code inconsistencies are more likely to be detected.
• Knowledge sharing is improved within the participants:
  • Small portions can be assimilated better.
• Better engineering practices are exercised:
  • Solving big problems by dividing them in well contained, smaller problems.
  • Exercising separation of concerns within the code changes.

What can I do to optimize my changes

• Use the PullRequestQuantifier to quantify your PR accurately
  • Create a context profile for your repo using the context generator
  • Exclude files that are not necessary to be reviewed or do not increase the review complexity. Example: Autogenerated code, docs, project IDE setting files, binaries, etc. Check out the Excluded section from your prquantifier.yaml context profile.
  • Understand your typical change complexity, drive towards the desired complexity by adjusting the label mapping in your prquantifier.yaml context profile.
  • Only use the labels that matter to you, see context specification to customize your prquantifier.yaml context profile.
• Change your engineering behaviors
  • For PRs that fall outside of the desired spectrum, review the details and check if:
    • Your PR could be split in smaller, self-contained PRs instead
    • Your PR only solves one particular issue. (For example, don't refactor and code new features in the same PR).

How to interpret the change counts in git diff output

• One line was added: +1 -0
• One line was deleted: +0 -1
• One line was modified: +1 -1 (git diff doesn't know about modified, it will
  interpret that line like one addition plus one deletion)
• Change percentiles: Change characteristics (addition, deletion, modification)
  of this PR in relation to all other PRs within the repository.

---

Was this comment helpful? 👍  :ok_hand:  :thumbsdown: (Email)
Customize PullRequestQuantifier for this repository.

[vizipi]

Pull request analysis by VIZIPI

Below you will find who is the most qualified team member to review your code.
This analysis includes his/her work on the code included in this Pull request, in addition to their experience in code affected by these changes ( partly found within the list of potential missing files below )   Feedback always welcome

No other active qualified developers found to review these specific changes. You might consider involving more team members with these code segments.

---

Potential missing files from this Pull request

No commonly committed files found with a 40% threashold

---

Committed file ranks

(click to expand)

99.24%[js-sdk/package.json]