Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

TST: Build workflow across different conditions #409

Merged
merged 7 commits into from
Oct 15, 2024

Conversation

mgxd
Copy link
Collaborator

@mgxd mgxd commented Oct 14, 2024

Addresses #378

Copy link

codecov bot commented Oct 14, 2024

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 96.91358% with 5 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 55.89%. Comparing base (8cc8db2) to head (e5124cc).
Report is 8 commits behind head on master.

Files with missing lines Patch % Lines
nibabies/workflows/tests/__init__.py 94.28% 0 Missing and 2 partials ⚠️
nibabies/workflows/anatomical/fit.py 75.00% 1 Missing ⚠️
nibabies/workflows/base.py 50.00% 1 Missing ⚠️
nibabies/workflows/tests/test_base.py 99.15% 0 Missing and 1 partial ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@             Coverage Diff             @@
##           master     #409       +/-   ##
===========================================
+ Coverage   38.47%   55.89%   +17.41%     
===========================================
  Files          66       68        +2     
  Lines        6319     6477      +158     
  Branches      975      809      -166     
===========================================
+ Hits         2431     3620     +1189     
+ Misses       3802     2658     -1144     
- Partials       86      199      +113     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@mgxd mgxd marked this pull request as ready for review October 15, 2024 18:24
@mgxd mgxd merged commit 7efc8c9 into nipreps:master Oct 15, 2024
16 checks passed
@mgxd mgxd deleted the tst/workflow-construction branch October 15, 2024 18:25
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant