Skip to content

nmr2701/506-project

Folders and files

NameName
Last commit message
Last commit date

Latest commit

 

History

21 Commits
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Repository files navigation

506-project

Midterm Report Video Link: https://youtu.be/WgToNAL0_b0

Project purpose: The purpose of the project is to create an application that would allow researchers in Biology at Boston University to share findings in Microbiomes from their research through a web application. The web application will allow users to search for data based on filters and display a series of informational, statistical inferences and plots which would deliver insights on the underlying data.

Project tasks: The project can be broken down into the following high level tasks: Scripting and cleaning: Scripts will need to be written responsible for reading the CSV files in which the research data is currently saved in, processing that data and storing it into a database. Full stack application: A front-end interface that will allow the user to search, filter and view the findings. A backend that can perform fetch operations from the database, dynamically create a dataframe on the underlying data, perform statistical methods on the dataframe and return the response to the client.

Clear goal(s) (e.g. Successfully predict the number of students attending lecture based on the weather report).

  • Predict the abundance of a plant pathogen across the United States based off pH and temperature

What data needs to be collected and how you will collect it (e.g. scraping xyz website or polling students).

  • CSVs

How you plan on modeling the data (e.g. clustering, fitting a linear model, decision trees, XGBoost, some sort of deep learning method, etc.).

  • Multivariate regression of abundance using multiple predictors

How do you plan on visualizing the data? (e.g. interactive t-SNE plot, scatter plot of feature x vs. feature y).

  • Scatter plots (pH and temp as x) (abundance as y), filter by biome

What is your test plan? (e.g. withhold 20% of data for testing, train on data collected in October and test on data collected in November, etc.).

  • Standard 80 - 20 split on available data

Edit https://raw.githubusercontent.com/zoey-rw/soil_microbe_GEMs/refs/heads/master/comets_shinyapp_example/species_abundance_filt.csv

there is a bunch of data to use all in

https://github.com/zoey-rw/soil_microbe_GEMs/tree/master/comets_shinyapp_example

Midterm Report:

Data Proccessing: The data preprocessing starts with loading organism abundance and environmental data from 'species_abundance_filt.csv' and 'organism_data_to_subset.csv'. These datasets are merged on matching species identifiers. Next, we find some relevant features like soil temperature, pH and moisture and select them. Duplicates are then removed and we fill missing values with mean values. The data is then split into 70% training and 30% testing sets. Finally, we use StandardScaler to transform the features to zero-mean and unit-variance distributions for better model performance later on.

predictive model: we aimed to predict the abundance of specific microbial species based on environmental factors, using pH and temperature as primary predictors. To achieve this, we merged two datasets: one containing environmental preferences for various species and another with abundance data, filtered to align through a shared species identifier. After merging, we selected the columns pH_preference, temperature_preference, and percentage (abundance) to serve as features and target variables.

Using this merged data, we trained a linear regression model, splitting the data with an 80-20 train-test ratio. After training the model, we evaluated its performance using Mean Squared Error (MSE) and R-squared (R²) metrics. The model produced a low MSE of 1.21x10^-8.The R-squared value was only 0.0077.

These results suggest that a simple linear regression model with pH and temperature as predictors lacks the complexity needed to capture the underlying patterns in abundance. Given the low R-squared value, it's clear that other environmental or biological factors are likely influencing abundance in ways our model cannot capture with these two predictors alone. Moving forward, we can either explore adding more relevant features to improve the model’s predictive power or try alternative models, such as polynomial regression or regularized linear models (such as gaussian process regression), to better capture complex relationships within the data.

image

Linear Regresssion Model

Linear Regression Model

Polynomial Regression Model

Polynomial Regression Model

XG Boost Model

XG boost Model

Gaussian Regression Model

Gaussian Model

Next Steps:

As mentioned above, our model doesn’t perform well hence we will keep experimenting with different models/distributions to match patterns of abundance. Moreover, we have started to notice some features that have quite a lot of impact to the abundance of an organism. However, we haven’t been able to incorporate these at this time. Some examples of these features are the biome the organism is from and the pH preference and temperature preference.

In addition to this, we are currently working on a web app to be able to eventually visualise all our findings

About

No description, website, or topics provided.

Resources

Stars

Watchers

Forks

Releases

No releases published

Packages

No packages published

Languages