-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 617
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
NIP-07: add NIP-44 calls #1063
NIP-07: add NIP-44 calls #1063
Conversation
We've come full circle 😂 |
I won't stand in the way of this if this is what most want. I still do think the batched calls are useful for improved UX and would be nice to align with NIP46 (especially bc I think NIP46 is the future and NIP07 will become increasingly obsolete, and having them be similar increases support for both). @alexgleason I am curious what your opinion is on exposing getConversationKey? |
We are debating too many hypotheticals. Does anybody have a Client implementation that calls NIP-44 methods with arrays? Is there a Signer that takes in and displays the array to the user for approval? If not, then let's merge this. If the need for arrays comes up, I am sure we can just add new methods to deal with that need. |
Well, there is this: https://github.com/fiatjaf/nos2x/pull/47/files, but I don't think it's deployed yet. I also used the same approach with alby. But neither is released, I'm just waiting for this discussion to resolve. So yeah, let's just go back to NIP 04 and add bulk options if we need them. |
Let's wait to see what @fiatjaf has to say, but I'm happy to keep this simple. I'll update my signer PRs |
What is the argument against having an optional |
The best argument for not needing |
You log into |
Fine. |
Looks like fiatjaf/nos2x#57 is merged. #983 is merged. Everyone is pretty much in agreement at this point. This should be ready to merge. |
Very simpler alternative to #940
It does the same thing as NIP-04 but with the better encryption.