-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.2k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
ssf: remove the reset_evt sdfw_update and echo service #19490
Conversation
CI InformationTo view the history of this post, clich the 'edited' button above Inputs:Sources:sdk-nrf: PR head: 3271e9c738b71f972faadb2b6152609678740386 more detailssdk-nrf:
Github labels
List of changed files detected by CI (54)
Outputs:ToolchainVersion: 342151af73 Test Spec & Results: ✅ Success; ❌ Failure; 🟠 Queued; 🟡 Progress; ◻️ Skipped;
|
You can find the documentation preview for this PR at this link. It will be updated about 10 minutes after the documentation build succeeds. Note: This comment is automatically posted by the Documentation Publish GitHub Action. |
samples/sdfw/ssf_client/src/main.c
Outdated
if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ENABLE_RESET_EVT_SUBSCRIBE_REQUEST)) { | ||
reset_evt_subscribe(); | ||
} | ||
|
||
if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ENABLE_SDFW_UPDATE_REQUEST)) { | ||
sdfw_update(); | ||
} |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Seems a bit strange to keep the sample here when this is disabled by default and so the sample effectively does nothing. Should we remove the sample entirely? Users should not be using this API for updating SDFW anyway.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I agree. If the sample is not changed to do something else with sdfw_services, then it is of no use after removing these services.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The only immediate use for this I can see would be for #19278. I still think we can remove sdfw_update
here though, and even the whole sdfw_update
client
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Agreed. Another possible suggestion is to invoke ssf_psa_generate_random
and get some random values. Given that it is that simple, and no PSA initialization is required.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I removed the ssf_client sample
7204ba4
to
6650334
Compare
I removed these entries. |
c9b31a5
to
b4b7ce9
Compare
fe54786
to
6ff65af
Compare
CI is green on rerun |
Missing changelog entry |
6ff65af
to
e08e6fe
Compare
Added an entry, please check if I added it to the right place - long time since I did an update to the sdk-nrf changelog. |
doc/nrf/releases_and_maturity/releases/release-notes-changelog.rst
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
doc/nrf/releases_and_maturity/releases/release-notes-changelog.rst
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
doc/nrf/releases_and_maturity/releases/release-notes-changelog.rst
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
e08e6fe
to
dabc136
Compare
dabc136
to
e608880
Compare
@ncs-test-leads and @nrfconnect/ncs-aurora-doc please review - green CI conflicting files are deleted |
@nrfconnect/ncs-test-leads * |
e608880
to
b685092
Compare
doc/nrf/releases_and_maturity/releases/release-notes-changelog.rst
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
doc/nrf/releases_and_maturity/releases/release-notes-changelog.rst
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
These are not needed any more. Also remove the ssf_client sample since all its services are now removed. Ref: NCSDK-30980 Signed-off-by: Håkon Amundsen <[email protected]>
b685092
to
3271e9c
Compare
These are not needed
Ref: NCSDK-30980